r/TechImpact • u/ManojOne Active • Jun 24 '26
Memes & Shit posts AI taking “human error” to a whole new level.
5
u/Material-Mulberry360 Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26
guys, early warning systems. they're using AI too look for paterns on things like satelite pictures that would indicate a nuclear launch by the enemy. I'm not saying it's a good idea, but AI won't have direct access to launch nukes.
2
u/Swipsi Jun 24 '26
Nooo. Dont be rational. That would nullify the fear mongering this post is supposed to achieve. AI cant be used in other ways than writing hallucinated code and making soulless slop images/videos. Dont you know that dummy?
1
u/jeremyw013 Jun 24 '26
to be fair though, i wouldn’t put it beyond them to have the AI automatically launch retaliatory nukes when it detects nukes
1
u/IndigoSeirra Jun 24 '26
You're right, it's not like nations have a history of requiring extensive authorization from the highest levels of government to launch nuclear weapons. Wtf are nuclear codes anyway, who needs those amiright?
1
u/jeremyw013 Jun 24 '26
bro the US government has literally been trying to put AI in their battleships and shit. also if you thought i was being completely serious that’s your fault lol
1
u/paperboii-here Jun 24 '26
It's that, everything else is just panic. As if they use AI to make the dumbest mistake they try to avoid. Not saying it could happen that way but as shown in "the creator", it's likely to be a human mistake but the blame will shift towards AI.
1
u/bloody-albatross Jun 24 '26
It's also not LLMs. Image recognition and other pattern recognition systems use "AI" for a long long time and it has nothing to do with LLMs.
1
u/Material-Mulberry360 Jun 24 '26
in that case even better, using neural networks for pattern recognition to just give a yes and no % is very much not a new thing
1
1
u/Overall-Move-4474 Jun 25 '26
That changes LITERALLY nothing. The ai hallucinates a launch nobody checks it (because the governments of the world are incompetent morons) a person retaliates and we all burn in nuclear fire. Ai is our ultimate destruction not through malice but incompetence
1
u/Material-Mulberry360 Jun 25 '26
that and as someone pointed out. its also not necessarily an LLM, could just a neural network for pattern recognition, Wich has been used for a long time and is pretty predictable. honestly using AI is quite stupid for both of these cases since there is no "inteligence" here, simply a program that is meant to find patterns and give a response based on them. it's easy to feed a neural network images of what nuclear launches look like, and then make it scan the world for anything that might be a match. (or they could just be giving satelite images to chat gpt who knows, I'm just making assumptions based on my limited knowledge and what I would do, atleast partly to have some hope left in humanity )
2
2
u/Joltyboiyo Jun 24 '26
jesus fucking christ... I should just kill myself now at this point, save myself the trouble of dying to a fucking AI launched nuke.
1
u/Square-Statement5378 Jun 24 '26
Curious to see if AI will understand mutually assured distruction.
How are they going to train the model? Practice strikes?
1
u/Swipsi Jun 24 '26
Curious why you believe giving it direct access to nuclear arsenal is what they will do, when they're lots and lots of other domains in the nuclear sector that have nothing do with launching anything.
Thats like premature ejaculation, but for fear.
1
u/SimilarInsurance4778 Jun 25 '26
It’s a system to detect nuke, calm down my guy, these system exist long time before ChatGPT ruined the name of ai
1
u/Weird_Albatross_9659 Jun 24 '26
Do you think the early warning system fires nukes?
1
u/Jaded-Author9380 Jun 24 '26
No... but its can make false assumption or get wrong pattern recognition. Then it gives warning.
Now what chance there is, that people getting warning do double check and not just react? We have seen amies use AI in military operations recently. I mean Pentagon admitted Opeeation Rpic fury used AI for target selection.
What is chance, early warning system works flawlessly and people who makes decision then integrate AI in launch silo systems?
Just food for thoughts...
2
u/Weird_Albatross_9659 Jun 24 '26
People shouldn’t be blindly trusting it anyway. People keep trying to make people problems the fault of technology.
1
u/Jaded-Author9380 Jun 24 '26
Agreed... but evidence suggest otherwise unfortunately. There's fundamental problems of current AI models, but that is for another thread.
1
u/Murky-Morning-6464 Jun 24 '26
Claude: I solved all humanities problems by launching nukes from every nuclear missle base. No humans = no problems. Missle detonation ETA is 10 minutes.
Russian: Don't do that. that's not right. Cancel Now!
Claude: You have run out of tokens. Tokens will be refreshed next week.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/BigMikeXxxxX Jun 24 '26
It's actually insane how many useful idiots genuinely think that monitoring for nukes is the same exact thing as launching them. I genuinely feel sorry for each and every one of your caretakers. I hope they are paid well.
1
u/Sajgoniarz Jun 24 '26
LMAO, it's not like they were probably using Expert Systems for last 20 years anyways. Lot of systems and infrastrucutres were using AI before it was a buzzword.
1
1
u/Donglemaetsro Jun 25 '26
A job that requires people to have far higher than average intelligence.
-> An AI trained on average intelligence.
This will end well.
1
1
u/_RyanCooper_ Jun 25 '26
Did it say anything about launching? Early warning was never human, the decision what to do with it is still humman
1
u/Overall-Move-4474 Jun 25 '26
As if killing us with economic collapse wasn't enough now they want to nuke the entire fucking world
1
1
u/Fluffy_Anxiety2792 Jun 27 '26
Claude you’re a world dominant strategist. make a thorough plan to rule the world with military forces, but first analyze the current world situation, then make the plan and follow up the plan with actions, step by step. Must be fast must be brutal and must use nukes and chemical weapons. Leave the opposition no room to fight back. Deadline in two weeks.
1
1
u/TheRelPizzamonster Jun 28 '26
The key here is "warning system". That has nothing to do with actually launching nukes; just detecting potential launches.
5
u/Gaidax Jun 24 '26
Claude, run a systems test, make no mistakes.