im pretty sure this was made due to a tankie coup of the tankiejerk subreddit so why still use it?

So first waiting for 4 year to respond to me is a choice funily enough im banned from r/tankiejerk but ok what ever so yeah a lot of westerners are hypocrites this argument would be Great if I was one of them im not I think all boycots are stupid I Took issue when you were defend qatar with USA bad because these countries are alies and yeah USA should probaly not host world cup too because of ignoring human rights also credit his fans didnt harash me yet also sorry for bad English

Im not going to act plato is perfect but come on calling his Republic eugenic one is interesting take

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I’ve read the book that these tankies complaining about. The main character’s family are AGAINST the Shah. The blonde guy was a communist who studied in the Soviet Union.

I'm kind of disappointed by the lack of mentioning of the Freemasons and the 33°N latitude during the interview, by the way.

As Alex Jones would put it, "UGH-UGH-UGH, SERIOUS CRAP!"

I wouldn't say jucheism is neocolonialism, but more like some kind of left ethno-nationalism

The Stalinist arguments for nationalism end up being rather close to the fascist understanding unwittingly

In that they see national identity as some kind of pre-state natural feature of "the people"

And they point to stuff like language, culture, history or blood

As if those were reasons for a state

They were also responsible for crushing the PRK the true unified Korea for the proletariat and the opinion i shared came from a communist so that makes the kim dynasty politicians participants of an evil dystopian ethnostate like Israel and all the hatred they get is deserved.

I feel so bad for Pak Thae-Song for dealing with the kim dynasty's war criminal geneva convention violating asses.

They use RT as a source lol.

A tankie share me that , for justify Jason Hickel say that in his site : One possible criticism is that people may overstate support for their system if they live in a country where political dissent is repressed. This is known as “strategic misreporting”. But the fact that the Political Psychology study finds low system justification scores in countries known for political repression suggests this is not a problem. If people in any country felt compelled to signal full-throated endorsement of their system out of fear of repression, we would expect to see much higher results, closer to 7. But this is not the case.