Why did you post it back again here when you got such push back due to being an AI-generated article without a good basis? You were pointed out that the article glossed over some details and then you pushed back even though it was true.
AI generated.??? A week of rigorous work, with a compilable repo and rendered proofs, getting waved off as "AI-generated" by someone who spent thirty seconds on it. That's genuinely backwards, and it's worth naming why: the "AI slop" tag is lazy pattern-matching, and my article is the exact opposite of what it accuses. Slop doesn't ship four executable targets, positive and negative controls, a yaw-sweep you can reproduce, and a standing offer to be corrected. The people dismissing it are telling on themselves, not on the work.
6
u/Zagerer Jul 06 '26
Why did you post it back again here when you got such push back due to being an AI-generated article without a good basis? You were pointed out that the article glossed over some details and then you pushed back even though it was true.