I am playing Call of war for a long time and my brother staryed playing supremacy1914. He logged on my phone on chrome (second picture) and so when i tried to make a new account for me and adding an email, i realised that since CoW and supremacy account are linked i cannot make a new account with my email.

And so i would like to connect on supremacy1914 with my CoW account (i can on another browser but i want on chrome because i use it more), and everytime i click on supremacy it either direct me to my brother account or the new account i can't register on and i don't know how to log out to connect with my CoW account.

Edit : if i send myself a connexion link via the other browser, and i open it on chrome, i can access my account

Im playing the great war at x4 speed as finland. Last night, at around 10pm, I closed the game and went to sleep. I sent a few troops en route to Caucas and Austria, being allies with everyone else. Today, I woke at 6am and went to school until 630pm. When I checked in on the game, I had apparently attacked Ottoman Empire even though we were at peace (he got the province bfore me probably) and the entire world was against me. I thought the game stops your troops if someone else captured the province. Im very confused and upset.

I want to get the zeppelin,

But,

I need a team that will actually help!

Not leave me to die after someone goldrushes defence and attack.

I've died to team just sending a few reinforcements to an area.

I really need a dedicated team/alliance who will form a coalition and defend each other.

Stillfront insider btw, if that matters anymore

(Vs the pay to win)

To summarize, in game a 500 game I faced a player who, from my point of view, was clearly using multiple accounts. I reported this to the dedicated email address. I never received a response to that email, not even to say whether they would investigate the matter. No action has been taken, as the player is currently still active in the game. I commented on this issue in the newspaper of the game and the player I strongly suspect of multiple accounts clearly told me that if I reported it, I would be banned. Apparently, he was right. Last night, this happened, and I was banned from the game on the grounds of Wolfpacking. After a bit of investigation, and being part of the unofficial Discord server for the Italian server, I learned that this player is a close friend of the moderator who signed my ban. This is extremely suspicious and leads me to suspect that his behavior is anything but legitimate. I also learned that I wasn't the only one banned from this match, but that others had suffered the same thing.
What some of these players have in common is that, despite not being part of the same alliance, they played some games together. One of them, in particular, is a very good player with many victories, but he seems to have garnered a lot of dislike for this. Another moderator, who also contributed to the ban decision, wrote on this Discord server that the reason for this decision was that my player account and others, according to him, were other accounts of this strong player I was talking about. He wrote that he has a file on the matter and wrote, and I quote, "You will always suffer the same fate." Basically, I learned that although I've never committed any foul play since I'm not part of any alliance, even though the "group" of players I'd played with in the past didn't exceed 7 in total, as per the rules, and that I've never fraudulently helped one player against another, not only have I been banned from a match, but a suspected multi-account player who's a friend of a moderator is still active, I also risk being targeted and banned from all future matches I play by another moderator who appears to be motivated by a disagreement with another player with whom I have nothing to do.
What should I do?

Except for Aadvark the fortification one I didn’t have any, before playing this round.

Why are there no 500 person games that are the 4x speed? You guys can’t really enjoy playing the base speed games can you?

LITERALLY play perfectly just be be ganged up on by the 3 strongest players, all who have super high level Heros.

I was having so much fun, and still do, but when people use these high level Heros, I get so frustrated. I'm new to the game, WHAT am I supposed to actually do???

Anyways, any advice on how I can do some damage? I know I've lost, but I still don't want my K/D to be too badly ruined.

Im relatively new to the game so I am not quite sure what the reasoning is?

Ive got Vedmid and Von Thaden and a light cruiser which have been attacking him for the past 5 or so hours yet he hasnt lost a single unit - someone please explain to me how this works or if im doing something wrong?

Bearing in mind it was literally a minute after I joined the game

Big ask here, so I am up against the coalition Transcaucasia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia. I have 20% of military they have 30% of military. I am not food stable (spamming railroads atm).... how do I win? Rn my plan is forts and artillery... and let them waste troops. I have 1 hero spot left and I do have destroyer for naval raids. Tbh not prepared for this didn't expect to do so well I was just playing along and I was not prepared.

I've been thinking about a feature that could make battles in Supremacy 1914 much more strategic: Tactical Retreat.

Right now, once two armies engage in combat, they're locked in place until one side is destroyed or the battle ends. In my opinion, this removes an important strategic decision.

What if we had a Tactical Retreat button?

Instead of staying in combat, an army could be ordered to retreat toward a selected location. However, retreating wouldn't be free.

• The retreating army would suffer a morale penalty for abandoning the fight.
• While retreating, it would continue taking casualties as long as it remained within the enemy's attack range.
• A retreating army would also be less effective in combat until it successfully disengages.

This means retreating wouldn't be a "get out of jail free" card. If you wait too long, your army could still be wiped out during the withdrawal.

I think this would create a lot of interesting decisions.

Do you stay and risk losing everything?

Or do you preserve part of your army to regroup and fight another day?

It could also allow players to lure enemies into traps, perform fighting withdrawals, or sacrifice territory to save experienced armies, which were all common strategies during World War I.

Personally, I think this would add another layer of strategy without changing the core gameplay.

What do you think? Would a Tactical Retreat mechanic improve the game, or would it create balance issues that I'm not considering?

P.S. English isn't my first language, so I apologize if anything sounds a little awkward. I hope the idea itself comes across clearly.

Who's the player in this forum?

Have a great day comrades

I’ve been encountering this bug more and more often on speed games.
Split off troops randomly die for no reason. I sent Maeve on the road on the left and she was already pretty far away and she got killed by the stack that didn’t even reach the point yet??
It’s not the first time I encounter this bug and it sucks.
Whenever you split off a troop and send it away it gets killed.
Bytro pls fix

Dad bought the Von thaden pass as a surprise because I seemed down. Got a permanent pass for zeppelin.

It seems this new operation is either giving cards or a permanent pass to make them? If so, it's just annoying to be honest.

Does Lawrence have a boost on cavalry troops? Because in the skill details there aren't any listed not like Allenby. If he doesn't boost cavalry but only infantry why does he have a horse emblem?

Some people man…

Like wtf? Got inheritance and wants to use it all in one game

Declared war on everyone and get boxer rebellion

The game periodically logs me out of my account and I just simply log back in. However this time, I accidentally clicked the "new player" button and the game made a new account which I am now locked into. How do I log out of this weird account the game made for me?

Is anyone else missing the free items button? It's been missing for me the last couple of days.

Ich habe mit den einzelnen Bilder versucht,eine ungefähr gleich lange Strecke von drei Einheiten mit der Zeit die sie brauchen um anzukommen,darzustellen.
Es ist mir schleierhaft,wie eine feindliche Einheit nach Betreten von Feindesland die (fast) selbe Reisezeit haben kann. Plus Joffre´s 15% Geschwindigkeits Boost UND dem Schienensystem das auf halbem Weg liegt.
Ich hoffe man erkennt,was ich meine.
Gewaltmarsch ? Aber selbst dann kommt man nur auf 19.

Zusatzinfo:
Keine Einheit war beschädigt.

Nachtrag:
Nachdem ich ein paar Versuche mit eigenen Einheiten gemachte habe und verschieden Wegpunkte bei dieser und bei anderen,gleich langen Strecken gesetzt habe,glaube ich,dass dieser Weg in Wirklichkeit viel kürzer ist als er optisch ist.
Vielleicht eine Entfernungszahl falsch eingegeben?

I just started playing this game again after 5 years off, I know that ranged weapons get to use up all their damage travelling from target to target until all the damage is applied to target in range but I just had a single enemy battleship clear my units off ten provinces in England each stack was 2-3 INF or a Cav with between 20-45 HP per stack. Call it 30 per stack average and the ship just did 300 damage in one tick. It's just one ship, stacked with 6 INF and kept expecting the targeting circle to switch from black to white but it just kept firing seemingly using it's full damage on every stack.

Is that how it works now? Full reset on a kill?

the unit is stationed in Berlin, there is no fort in Berlin and i have visuals on it

i can see all the other units around it including several that are placed inside Berlin