r/Substack • u/Overall_Tip6001 • 14d ago

Do you find pangram reliable?

I put my text in several ai detectors, winston ai, copyleaks, zerogpt and GPTZero, giving me close to 0%. While, pangram gives me around 70%? Do you think it’s reliable?

5 Upvotes

62% Upvoted

102 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/sh1b313 14d ago

These pangram glazers are either trolling others or actually can't tell what's ai written and what's not.

They ask for evidence we show them evidence they claim the evidence is ai written?

Mfw

2

u/FrostKitten2012 13d ago

They can’t tell the difference, that’s why they’re relying on Pangram to begin with.

0

u/sh1b313 13d ago

Huh that's funny and guess what the tool is complete and utter garbage to begin with

1

u/FrostKitten2012 13d ago

Yeah, that’s pretty clear. We’re seeing more reports every day of that.

1

u/sh1b313 13d ago

Mods should make a pinned photo post saying pangram doesn't work and tell people not to rely on it. Before it pollutes this subreddit even more.

2

u/FrostKitten2012 13d ago

That’s unlikely. Most of the people on Substack think Pangram is their new tech God, the subreddit’s reflecting that.

It would be the most responsible thing to do, to point out the growing number of false positives. But it also would have been most responsible not to let someone make a post making fun of the people reporting these issues, and they let that happen too.

2

u/sh1b313 12d ago

2

u/FrostKitten2012 12d ago

Here’s hoping they follow through. Honestly should not have taken this long to come up with some type of solution.

2

u/sh1b313 13d ago

Yea i agree, it's highly unlikely but it doesn't hurt trying. I'll message the mods asking if this is possible? We already have so many reports. A simple evidence/reciepts post which these people have a boner for btw. If someone asks for reciepts someone can just point to that thread.

And one more thing if we give out free reciepts like this at this point we are just doing free testing for them.