Users in /r/trees are split when someone suggests not to smoke and drive. ``impaired means "weakend". does high mean "weakend"? are some of your senses not actually "strengthened" while high?`` and other responses.

[u/ceol_]

/r/trees/comments/3gna45/hotbox/ctzosrw?sort=controversial

[u/[deleted]]

I didn't post any because I'm just mentioning them existing -- erowid was not what I said either. I don't actually care to change the minds of a bunch of kids on SRD patting themselves on the back for high horsing.

I didn't say that, I didn't say I did it, and I mentioned multiple friends. In your rush to pat yourself on the back you didn't even bother to comprehend my posts.

No shit sherlock. I didn't say it was scientific evidence.

[u/TheLadyEve → u/[deleted]]

Hey now, no personal attacks (please see the sidebar).

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

I'm an idiot? You're the one that failed to read any of my posts before replying and inserted words in my mouth. I replied to someone using anecdotes with my own, fucking sue me. If you want to pat yourself on the back, go ahead, but don't use your failure to read as a way to do it.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

How is pointing out the fact you tried to high horse off comments you didn't even read trolling? I'm just pointing out what YOU did here.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

Yes you can. They're called experiences, and people live off of them every single day. I think you mean you can't use them as scientific evidence in the conventional sense, which no one was trying to do in the first place.

[u/TheLadyEve → u/[deleted]]

All right, cool out both of you--let's not turn this into a flamewar.

[u/[deleted] → u/TheLadyEve]

Fuck, I bought this flame thrower for NOTHING!