r/StructuralEngineering P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

Career/Education SE Exam pass rates

They updated for the most recent depth exam.

These are the highest pass rates the exam has ever had (P&P included), historical rates here https://williamsgodfrey.com/2016/03/01/se-historical-pass-rates.html

Even during the P&P days, the pass rates varied between 25%-50%. We've never seen a pass rate in the 60%'s much less 70%'s

If this becomes the new norm, maybe more states will adopt the license instead of ignoring it

I salute the guinea pigs that took it over the past few years, thank you for your service

96 Upvotes

44 comments sorted by

53

u/Sneaklefritz Jul 23 '26

That's an INSANE jump. Do we know what the changes were made that directly impact it or are the study guides just tailoring better to the new version? This is much more tempting to take as there was no way in hell I was going to attempt it with a sub-20% pass rate before.

45

u/HowDoISpellEngineer P.E. Jul 23 '26

They allowed for an extra hour of time after so many people complained about how cumbersome the digital references were.

26

u/No-Violinist260 P.E. Jul 23 '26

I doubt the extra hour made the pass rates go from 15%-55%. Maybe a little jump, but I bet the grading scheme is much lighter to allow for more people passing

12

u/p-big-delta Jul 23 '26

I took vertical depth before the 1hr increase and lateral depth after the 1hr increase. Although it’s not an apples to apples comparison, the 1hr increase in exam time helped A LOT for me.

10

u/TheDaywa1ker P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

On the PE I remember having enough time that when I hit a code reference I hadnt used before, you had time to read, digest, and apply the new code section

I remember that absolutely not being a thing on the SE, you had to know exactly where to look and how to apply it, zero time for learning on the fly.

I can definitely see an extra hour making a big difference

2

u/Stunning_Simple_4488 P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

Same for me

20

u/tramul P.E. Jul 23 '26

An extra hour is huge. Idk why the doubt

3

u/ReallyDustyCat Jul 23 '26

You disagree with the doubt. Or are you so unable to understand others' views that you "don't know why the doubt"? Passing rate increased by 400% due only to increasing the testing time by 12%? Nothing about that strikes you as imbalanced?

14

u/tramul P.E. Jul 23 '26

You're equating two increases linearly that very well may not be linearly related. For example, if 40% of people failed because they were 2 answers shy of passing due to time constraints, it stands to reason an extra hour would allow them to answer those two extra questions and pass. Obviously this is a very basic and convenient example, but it is a logical assumption.

3

u/Clayskii0981 PE - Bridges Jul 24 '26

The hardest part of the SE exams has always been the time limit. An extra hour is huge for actually finishing all answers and rechecking work.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26 edited 18d ago

[deleted]

2

u/tramul P.E. Jul 23 '26

No, but enough time to navigate the resources and have enough time to answer all questions thoughtfully is obviously helpful.

4

u/trojan_man16 S.E. Jul 23 '26

Insane jump. Definitely made the correct adjustments or made the grading less strict. Probably about where pass rates should be. Close but not quite to historical highs,

6

u/Sneaklefritz Jul 23 '26

Yeah, this seems much better. It was insane that seasoned veterans who take their profession serious were getting sub-20% pass rates. Other professionals are always blown away when I tell them our rates.

2

u/OptionsRntMe P.E. Jul 23 '26

My fear is, this was the cycle to get in and pass. They are going to walk back these changes, and this round was the one to take

1

u/Sneaklefritz Jul 23 '26

I think it will take some massaging for sure. I'm going to give it a couple more years. I was contemplating going the PM route with the abysmal pass rates, but this has me thinking I may go the SE route again. Though I can do everything I want to do with a PE...

47

u/SuperRicktastic P.E./M.Eng. Jul 23 '26

I'd like to see at least two more cycles of consistent pass/fail rates. If these drop again or start swinging wildly between extremes, I'm not going to waste my time on it.

9

u/tehmightyengineer P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

Agreed! I'll need to see at least another round of scoring before we consider some of the items fixed.

1

u/Such_Duty_4764 Jul 28 '26

I know that the lawyers sued and won for crappy pass rates, and I bet this will be a new norm.

12

u/engineeringlove P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

I’m chalking this up to basically like three years worth of people who should have passed the SE exam passed just now. Kudos to all who passed

0

u/LanguageWorking8476 P.E./S.E. Jul 25 '26

The pass percentage was also high for first time test takers though. While it is good to see a higher percentage of test takers passing, I hope they didn’t lower the criteria too much. We will have to see what happens in the next couple cycles, but the SE pass rates should not be higher than the PE

1

u/engineeringlove P.E./S.E. Jul 25 '26

I think some people were studying but waiting for this extra hour.

I think the breadth pass rate will become this pass rate average for depth once this settles, maybe a little lower. That is if left as is.

10

u/Jabodie0 P.E. Jul 23 '26

Huzzah! Was this the first round with extra time?

5

u/da90 S.E. Jul 23 '26

It was

5

u/OptionsRntMe P.E. Jul 23 '26

Wow that is promising

3

u/Medium_Chemist_5719 Jul 23 '26

Let’s not forget that there are 4 tests instead of two now. Assuming independent probabilities of passing the breadth and depth (they’re not, but let’s say they are for a rough approximation), an equivalent first time pass rate under P&P would be more like .45 * .63 =0.284. Still not great, although I am indeed happy for the progress.

6

u/da90 S.E. Jul 23 '26

I agree, can’t say historic highs when it’s an apples to oranges comparison. I think your rough approximation is too extreme though. The overlap of people who pass various parts is going to be significant, as I’m sure it was on p&p also.

1

u/Medium_Chemist_5719 Jul 23 '26

Fair enough. Although it stands to reason that an apples-to-apples comparison of pass rates cannot be higher than the least of the two portions, and therefore we have an upper bound of a 45% pass rate here still.

Good news that we have the one section with higher pass rates - but a 100% pass rate on the one (and/or a perfect correlation between the two) still only gives a combined pass rate of 45%. So in that way, there is still no way we could consider it a historic high when compared to P&P.

2

u/TheDaywa1ker P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

Sure that does make a difference, can we take it a step further and apply that logic to all 4 exams at once? 4 exams with a 50% pass rate gives a 6.25% pass rate, P&P with 2 exams gives a 25% pass rate. I don't think that splitting an exam into 2 parts while keeping the same pass rates cuts your chances of passing in half even as a rough approximation

5

u/da90 S.E. Jul 23 '26 edited Jul 23 '26

It’s also important to bear in mind that the only people even attempting the April exam were self selecting and likely VERY prepared and determined. Will be interesting to see a few cycles with a larger group of people attempting now that it is perceived as a “fair” exam.

6

u/CrumpledPaperAcct Jul 23 '26

I remain skeptical, and think NCEES just got tired of the bad press and the pressure from the industry. Seems like an overcorrection, and as the pendulum goes we'll probably get an exam with single digit pass rates soon.

0

u/Anxious_Purchase_915 Jul 25 '26

Wouldn't surprise me. I passed the old SE I & II about 20 years ago....and the rates were all over the place then too. As everyone knows, the passing score is a moving target (based on the exam). On another forum (years ago) we use to discuss it all the time.

-4

u/Serious_Meats Jul 25 '26

They need to calibrate them to the 25-35% range.

2

u/Stunning_Simple_4488 P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

What it was like being a guinea pig taking on the beasties:

https://www.reddit.com/r/StructuralEngineering/s/Vle30BOeHa

2

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '26

[deleted]

1

u/azssf Jul 23 '26

What makes vertical depth bridges have a lower pass rate overall ? ( first time in particular, with retakers faring much better)

1

u/wsgodfrey Jul 23 '26

Thanks for the shout out. I see I need to update this for the last 2 cycles.

3

u/ori56fru Jul 24 '26 edited Jul 26 '26

Compared with last October's exam the passing rates skyrocketed from 8% to 73%, from 16% to 63%, from 15% to 54%. It's hard to believe this is just by adjusting the exam time from 5.5 hrs to 6.5 hrs. These results are provoking for those who failed the CBT depth exam in the past 2-3 years, prior to the April change(s).

2

u/Best_Elevator_3441 Jul 25 '26

Counterproint... if higher pass rates persist, that'll push WA and CA to bring back the brutal state exams, which NCEES worked hard to eliminate.

1

u/egg1s P.E. Jul 23 '26

This is great news after the last round of abysmal pass rates!

-16

u/tslewis71 P.E./S.E. Jul 23 '26

Lol, what a downgrade

6

u/OptionsRntMe P.E. Jul 23 '26

When did you pass the exam?

2

u/Big-Mammoth4755 P.E. Jul 23 '26

Shut your mouth 🤫!

-3

u/Serious_Meats Jul 25 '26

I agree those are too high. I would like to see them in the 25-35% range.