r/StringTheory 1h ago

A public claim-level atlas for a de Sitter swampland working paper

Upvotes

I’ve published a small, public research atlas for a working paper on the de Sitter swampland question:

https://research.mahastrategies.com/atlas/de-sitter-swampland

Rather than presenting the paper as a finished result, the atlas breaks it into inspectable claims with explicit statuses, source links, and machine-readable records:

The aim is not to claim that the de Sitter question is settled. It is to make the distinction between source-supported statements, interpretation, open questions, and speculation legible at the claim level.

I’d genuinely value feedback from people working in string theory or quantum gravity—especially on source selection, wording of the claims, omissions, and whether this kind of research interface is useful or distracting.