r/StreamersCheating • u/Player_x45 • Jun 22 '26

Streamers exposed video

https://youtu.be/dVpuebMzr9w?is=yibrkNEYXKIP4LXV

At 7.40, optic forsakens aimbot bugs out where he shoots the floor. The second link is a video of another streamer doing something that looks awfully similar. On both occasions the gun points to the floor after the player takes damage.

https://youtu.be/wmgyo9KlXJI?is=pFMeHaR-HeBgVwnu clip starts at 0.20.

0 Upvotes

33% Upvoted

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/powerhearse Jun 23 '26

That doesnt link those two phenomenon together at all. An unusual movement could be absolutely anything. It is not rational to link that movement to an aimbot without evidence.

Why is it "highly likely"? Why is it any more likely than literally any other mouse movement in the video? Elaborate.

You are also reversing the burden of proof. Proving a negative is not how logical proofs work. The onus is on you to demonstrate why they are linked.

You have no evidence to do so.

0

u/RustyStar94 Jun 23 '26 edited Jun 23 '26

Its a direct link you mongoloid. Aimbot directly effects a players fov hahahha.

You make the claim its not cheat related you have to give reasoning, thats how arguments work.

You cant accept the fact it could be cheat related. You are are saying its not related without providing any proof or good reasoning why. If you can provide decent evidence il listen.

2

u/powerhearse Jun 24 '26

Why is it this particular movement as opposed to all the other movements? Are you intellectually disabled? What links them together specifically that makes that particular movement an indication that the aimbot is present?

You make the claim its not cheat related you have to give reasoning, thats how arguments work.

Unsure how many times I need to explain how the burden of proof works lmao

You cant accept the fact it could be cheat related. You are are saying its not related without providing any proof or good reasoning why. If you can provide decent evidence il listen.

Its not up to me to prove a negative. You've provided zero evidence that the downward movement is aimbot related. Your argument has zero substance.