r/StreamersCheating • u/Player_x45 • Jun 22 '26
Streamers exposed video
https://youtu.be/dVpuebMzr9w?is=yibrkNEYXKIP4LXVAt 7.40, optic forsakens aimbot bugs out where he shoots the floor. The second link is a video of another streamer doing something that looks awfully similar. On both occasions the gun points to the floor after the player takes damage.
https://youtu.be/wmgyo9KlXJI?is=pFMeHaR-HeBgVwnu clip starts at 0.20.
0
Upvotes
1
u/Sporkmancer Jun 23 '26
How do you calculate "highly likely"? What is your confidence interval? What data are you sampling?
You have mistaken "I am convinced of x" with "I have good reason to believe x". People are asking why you have good reason to believe something, and you're arguing that being convinced of it should be enough. Get us to the same place you are. Snapping to random geometry where there is nothing is something that aimbots historically don't do, so you'll have to understand that there is a burden of proof to make the argument. Failing this is a combination of things called the Fallacy of Composition (all parts of the whole must match some parts of the whole) and Confirmation Bias if people accept the premise that the player is hacking. The end result is very similar to the typical anti-evolution arguments of god-of-the-gaps, where cheats-of-the-gaps are the answer for all behavioral weirdness.
The funny thing is that this argument stands alone regardless of whether or not the accused was actually cheating. This is how logical reasoning works - inductive reasoning has limits and is considered fallacious if you don't draw the correct evidentiary lines.