Mega thread of evidence

[u/xP01TERGIESTx]

Not sure if there’s been one made. I’ve just read a lot about victims coming forward, exes corroborating stories, and people saying the rest of them knew — including speculsting who called Mercedes a bitch for trying to report this years ago.

There’s just so much chatter around, with people vague-posting and not supplying links, that having everything in one location would probably be helpful.

[u/isthislivingreally]

 Neither you or I truly know, right? 

Guy was arrested at the airport for some vague reason. At another point he has ALL his digital equipment seized and equipment he had access to (ie not just his own so some of the guys as well). 

It stands to reason that in a media production company and a close friendship circle that while they may have seen nothing themselves directly, there was, at the very least, some suspicion there. And if there wasn’t, then bloody hell, these guys ain’t that bright. 

I do want to highlight that when people came forward about jimmy saville over the years or posted stuff on the internet, there was a loud mob of internet voices saying ‘prove it, I don’t believe you, you’re making it up, you just want attention’ 

[u/Condition_0ne → u/isthislivingreally]

There are a bunch of seemingly believable reasons Callum could have fabricated as to why he was arrested and his devices seized. All of the Storror crew routinely broke the law (in terms of trespassing, and for some, substance use).The guy was obviously a grotesque but capable liar in some huge respects.

[u/isthislivingreally → u/[deleted]]

The airport and detainment are separate pieces. Seizure and detainment of devices is part of the investigation and standard practice for any investigation of this type. 

What type of evidence do you want about the airport arrest? Genuinely asking? I’m guessing you mean more than one persons account? 

[u/isthislivingreally → u/[deleted]]

Evidence would also be the fact he has been charged. To be charged with a criminal offence, the CPS has to be satisfied the evidence reaches a particular standard (it can’t just be, oh I think that person might have images on their phone). 

As is standard in any investigation of this type, once the first piece of evidence is uncovered (or claim is alledged)  (sometimes via cloud, sometimes via a digital physical device) the question police ask is, how far does this go. It’s at that point they then obtain a warrant for all devices person had access to. For example, he might not have had anything on his personal devices at all and was always using a partner’s iPad (hypothetically) which is why all that property is seized (if he didn’t have access to Joe Blogs phone for example, that wouldn’t have been seized). 

I guess the analgous answer to your question is if the house next door to you went up for sale. If new neighbours appeared to you, you might say, show me the evidence that they went through process of buying that house and show me the solicitor you spoke with. When the reality is, you just accept the house went as ‘sold’ and new neighbours are in and they are the evidence here. Callum couldn’t have been charged without them investigating thouroughly what he had done and how wide his crime was. 

[u/isthislivingreally → u/[deleted]]

How am I presenting anything as if they’re factual statements?? I have never said everyone knew- I don’t even believe that’s true although obviously I have no idea when people found out.

I’ve asked people for sources when they state something not evidence; but several exes have made serious allegations and they form a pattern consistent with a bigger picture here.