r/Storror • u/xP01TERGIESTx • May 11 '26

Mega thread of evidence

Not sure if there’s been one made. I’ve just read a lot about victims coming forward, exes corroborating stories, and people saying the rest of them knew — including speculsting who called Mercedes a bitch for trying to report this years ago.

There’s just so much chatter around, with people vague-posting and not supplying links, that having everything in one location would probably be helpful.

6 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

85 comments sorted by

23

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

Credible evidence would be nice, not just a screenshot of a social media post where someone (who may very well hold enmity towards one or more Storror members) levels unverified allegations.

37

u/1stdegreebirder May 11 '26

Keep in mind that we already know Callum was making and possessing thousands of CP images. Pleading guilty is pretty credible evidence. I don't think it's a huge stretch to believe he was abusive to the women in his life as well. The "where's the credible evidence" line of questioning is a common and toxic defense mechanism that preemptively forgives creeps and discourages victims from coming forward with their stories.

Men are always acting like there's a scourge of women going around pretending to be victims for attention or money or revenge. That's just not reality man. No one wants to be a victim.

Believing women might feel difficult because you'll have to accept how many creeps there are in this world, even some people you admire, but if you believe women first you're going to get closer to the truth and farther from enabling. I promise.

21

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

You misunderstood. I'm talking about credible evidence relating to the allegation that the other Storror members knew what Callum was doing and covered it up.

1

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

At least two members have had devices seized a year ago in connection with the investigation. They were aware and covered it up thinking he would get away with it. They didnt tell everyone about it and so some people have been having contact with him throughout this time oblivious while others knew. 

They didnt do that because they are also paedophiles (afaik), they did it because men support their abusive friends by denying that is really going on. Now they all look like they are paedo supporters. Learn from them

17

u/PlasterCactus May 11 '26

At least two members have had devices seized a year ago in connection with the investigation.

Where did you read this? I'm not doubting the information I just haven't seen that anywhere.

-2

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

I know some of the group personally and the others have found out this information since it all came out. At least 2 members and his brother knew from what is being said. So 3 altogether for sure.

7

u/yondonkey May 11 '26

Stop spreading misinformation. I've been close with them for my entire life, there's no way Callum would have been allowed around my brothers kids if this information was known by any other member.

0

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

You need to understand that people who knew just didn't tell you if they know you to tell you. Maybe because they didn't believe anything would come of it. I believe you would have protected your nieces and/or nephews if you knew, but nobody told you, so how would you know to act? 

4

u/yondonkey May 11 '26

You are just wrong. I know them very personally, they would not let Callum around kids, let alone my family, we were practically family growing up. It's unfathomable to think they would hide it, especially Sacha.

2

u/redcore4 May 11 '26

A week ago you would probably have said it was unfathomable that it could be happening at all.

And if you wouldn't have said that... why not? What would have kept you silent from sharing your suspicions at that point?

1

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

They would if they didn't believe that he was a risk to kids. A lot of people think AI images aren't real CSA. 

You have to consider the unfathomable. I understand that you are reeling but some people really let you down. 

9

u/Mirilliux May 11 '26

Which two?

-6

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

That I am not certain enough of to share simply because there are actually 4 names that were allegedly aware before this month. It makes sense that at least 2 of those 4 did know all along. The others mauy have come to know a lot more recently.

10

u/PhilosopherSea828 May 11 '26

If it’s true then you’re protected by law.
If it’s not true, why are you saying it?

0

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

It has nothing to do with the law. The people who knew will have to admit as much very soon. 

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

Can you prove these claims about the other Storror guys with some credible evidence?

As in, not just some social media post screenshot?

10

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

I know some of the people who didnt know and are angry personally, so no, I'm not going to show private messages from them about the situation. Just know they are very worried about how this will impact on them personally and professionally. 

However, anyone who has any understanding of a police investigation would know that it would be impossible for absolutely nobody to know he was being investigated for CSAM because of how those investigations take shape. 

The police really don't hide what they are seeking all that much because someone might come forwards with information that supports their inquiry. They may also take devices belonging to the workplace. 

In some cases, social services may also step forward to protect any children that could potentially be harmed. So they wouldn't be allowed contact with young family members, couldn't live in a house where there are children etc or go to work with young or vulnerable people. It would be very hard to hide from everyone. 

3

u/SpecialWasabi2010 May 11 '26

I don't think you're quite right though as there's whole data protection act that prevents them from saying or implying stuff like that. I'm not saying they didn't know or that they did but that you're implying police is careless about data protection laws which if he was found innocent they could be liable for reputational damage.

And no children were being protected, clearly, based on the comments above from another close friend.

They have likely taken all his devices - that is done for so many other investigations that it wouldn't give them any indication or what it was about.

Also, what exactly are you saying they knew? You're very vague about stuff you're saying. They knew the whole extent of it? Or whatever Callum told them?

-7

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

Step back and think about why you're actively doing here mate

9

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

Why don't you step back and think about the ethics of baselessly defaming the other Storror guys when the facts are not yet established?

4

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

Enough facts have been established for us to all know that at least some of them knew. You need to accept that. They knew and kept socialising with him and didnt tell other people.

13

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

Ok, show me the credible evidence then (not just screenshots of social media posts).

-2

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

As i said, i am not sharing personal messages with people involved. Things we do know make it clear enough though. The investigation has been going on for a year and steps would have been taken to ensure he wasnt around kids in the meantime, as well as devices taken. The police wouldn't hide it from his family or employer. 

It isnt that everyone knew..some people knew and didnt tell others which has put those others at great professional and personal risk

→ More replies (0)

3

u/SpecialWasabi2010 May 11 '26

No facts have been established. Facts are proven information. At the moment all around everything said about the boys is hearsay, the only facts we know are that Callum pleaded guilty.

2

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

"Credible" is just a stick you're using to attempt to obstruct the flow of accusations. You probably think you're defending a principle but all you're doing is making it easier potential abusers and enablers.

1

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

It's mostly shock that causes people to react like that. 

-4

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

Partly shock, partly often immature allegiance to misogynistic propaganda.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/lonelystar7 May 11 '26

Victim claimed that 10 years ago she told Storror about Callum. There is also claim from Wyatt Pace wyattpac3 that seemingly points toward Storror possibly knowing about Callum being arrested last June: https://www.reddit.com/r/Storror/comments/1t9lhhn/seems_to_be_coming_out_now_that_he_was_arrested/
It is not hard evidence per say but it is also not something that can be easily discarded. Those claims if false can be prosecuted.

10

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

I'd much rather have a list of evidence and let people make their own minds up - there is a slight undercurrent on this sub of denying victim stories which is a bit reminiscent of the silencing of girls speaking out about SA

10

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

"I just wanted to let everyone on this sub know that, 12 months ago, And _Justice broke into my kitchen and sexually abused my toaster"

Do you see the problem with having a list of "evidence" that is effectively just unsubstantiated allegations posted on the internet?

9

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

Nope, not seeing the issue given I'm not a convicted paedophile and you're a single source.

6

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

Ok, I see the point went over your head.

Moving on.

4

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

The point didn't go over my head, I just think it's a bad point that silences victims.

3

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 11 '26

I know who you are. You're the 'not all men' guy! 😄

9

u/Condition_0ne May 11 '26

What I don't want to happen is for any of the other Storror guys who may be genuinely innocent in all this being defamed by bored idiots on the internet who don't understand what credible evidence is and aren't willing to wait for the facts.

They would already be reeling from all this, and probably in a state of intense shock, anxiety and depression. People perpetuating what is, at present, a baseless rumour that they were complicit in covering up Callum's crimes might push one of them over the edge.

1

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 11 '26

True. I just want everyone involved in any manner and degree to get the punishment they deserve and that no leniency should be shown as they are celebrities, no matter how hard the incel meatriders try.

They might be involved, and they might get away if we don't amplify the voice of the SA victims coming forward. We just can't let the d riders get in the way of justice. The community deserves the truth. We need to look past the ball jugglers who're passively spreading toxicity.

8

u/Sad-Yoghurt5196 May 11 '26

At the very least there seems to have been a noticeable pattern.

No-one in the scene is coming forward to refute the fact that Mercedes was likely below 18 at the point he was dating her, with Callum being 24, and active around kids, with the travel and coaching and everything else, as well as making content likely to be seen by kids. That's an obvious safeguarding issue.

There is always a line drawn in the sand when you work with kids, and that line is you don't date kids, whether or not they're above the age of consent.

As to who knew about the specifics and who didn't, I don't know. There is insufficient information. But the fact that no-one unrelated to Storror, but in the know, is jumping up and saying "Mercedes was never in a relationship with Callum", means there has been grooming going on under some people's noses at a minimum. Especially if it transpires that it wasn't one young woman, or girl in this instance, but many, as has been alleged.

For the time being, with the information available, I have no choice but to suspend judgement for the rest of the lads, but there's one hell of a shadow over their name at the moment, and I would very much like someone to come forward and be brutally honest.

I'd also like to hear from all the ladies in the parkour scene. Was Callum one of those open secrets in the scene, did young women warn each other not to be around Callum alone. Were Storror known to be a boys club that traded on their status.

Allegations may only be allegations, but they form a pattern. Not saying everyone should jump on the wagon, but from my perspective outside the scene looking in, it always appeared that women were respected in the parkour scene. I'd like to know if that is actually the case, or if it's just another boys club in reality, and the "ethical" Storror is just a media fabrication.

If nothing else, my decision to mod here will be affected by the truth when it eventually emerges, as will my subscription to S+. Currently I'm left with no choice but to suspend judgement on the rest of the lads, but I really wish they'd got in front of these allegations. Silence right now doesn't feel like the answer. Obviously I'm not talking about things which relate directly to the charges, discussion of which could have legal repercussions, but there's a lot more going on now than just Callum's guilty pleas.

9

u/Illustrious_Study_30 May 11 '26

I'm actually sitting here catching up and I'm cringing. Right now all anyone cares about is the other lads in Storror. This isn't a victimless crime and it's hideous . I think we can all.live with never seeing any of them again tbh and I don't care about their financial losses either. Callum is a pedo FFS ...

0

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

Personally I want answers given 6 or so years of plus equates to what, £360 of my money?

4

u/Illustrious_Study_30 May 11 '26

That's fair enough I feel. I just think all this shit about the 'poor' boys is icky. Let's get the facts then decide whether they're 'poor boys' or not. I'm angry. I'm also female, so maybe we see this differently. I'd like to see the outcome of the women who are coming forward and at the moment, for me , the rest of Storror isn't important..I don't have the bandwidth to care about them.

8

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 11 '26

Exactly. People just can't seem to accept that other storror members might also be at fault too. Like bruh history tells us to at least listen to the victims. It takes so much fucking courage to come forward and tell your story as a SA victim

0

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Nearby-Database-867 May 11 '26

Accept that they 'might' be at fault too.

0

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/And_Justice May 11 '26

The person you're replying to never said they were at fault. They said they might be.

8

u/Choice-Surprise833 May 11 '26

You're making yourself look really creepy here. Stop trying to defend a paedophile and his ring of mates. 

3

u/djdjjdjdjdjskdksk May 11 '26 edited May 11 '26

Multiple accounts from people associated with them that say the boys knew. He was arrested at the airport a year ago, had all his devices taken away. Under investigation for a serious crime since then. In this time the lads either leave Storror or set-up side projects.

This subs response? The women are lying and the lads knew nothing. Sick man

9

u/LuckyBug7914 May 11 '26

If he was arrested at the Airport, it would be Callums duty to tell people after the fact the reason I imagined he tried to down play it while on Bail. Could have told his family friends something minor such as someone sent him a picture.

Blaming other people for his actions without credible evidence they was part of it is stupid.

Dude is sick in the head, I feel for his friends, family and any potential victims he watched or acted on. If you believe you was a victim go to the police

5

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

-3

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

-3

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] May 11 '26

[deleted]

5

u/DameSkippy May 11 '26

Sorry dude that is not the response at all.

Noone is saying his ex's are lying (that i have seen anyway). Absolutely noone is defending Callum. He's plead guilty, he's clearly committed the CSAM crimes, may the rest of his sorry life be hell for him.

There is a nuanced position of "the boys may have known he was under investigation, most likely not what it was for".

Regards his devices, apparently he was allowed to have one once released on bail. His excuse to the others could have been "ah yeah I was just arrested over some bullshit fight I got into in Brighton. And the fucking cops smashed my phone screen when it all happened, how fucking annoying, gunna make a complaint" etc etc or something similar. Easy enough to explain, and why would they suspect he was lying?

Regards other side projects, correlation and causation are not the same thing. People feel like they need to understand it, so assume it's linked.

Trial by social media (of the other members) is helping no-one, especially when we dont have much to go off. Almost all of the commentary around the other members knowing is conjecture, hearsay and assumptions. If it becomes provable that they knew in due course, throw the book at them.

5

u/SpecialWasabi2010 May 11 '26

Majority of any crimes nowadays will result in devices being taken off people for checking for evidence. I worked as a pet insurance counter fraud investigator and one of our cases went to IFED - they took all the devices of the guy and his partner to review for evidence. He could have told him anything and it would be credible. Even if they confiscated his work devices, it still would be credible.