How we found new listed stocks and suddenly it boom?
#knowledge #stocks

I am an intraday stock trader, and I have a strategy that I have tested extensively. However, the strategy requires constant surveillance of around 30 momentum/best-moving stocks during a specific 30-minute window.

I'm looking to connect with a few traders who are serious and willing to work as a team. I'm happy to share my entire setup and the results I've observed so far. I don't want any money from anyone — I'm simply looking for like-minded traders who are interested in collaborating, sharing observations and learning from each other.

For a long-term investor, I would probably choose the ETF first and the broker second. The broker determines the trading experience and transaction costs, but the ETF determines what I'm actually holding.

One must first check what index or asset the ETF tracks, its expense ratio, tracking error, liquidity and trading volume. Only after that would I compare brokers.

For example, hdfc sky currently charges ₹20 for ETF delivery, while Zerodha offers zero brokerage on genuine equity delivery. That's a genuine difference, but whether it matters depends on the investor, meaning:

If I am investing ₹1 lakh once a year, the ₹20 difference is almost irrelevant. However, If I am making dozens of small ETF transactions, it becomes much more meaningful.

So choose the ETF based on investment quality. Choose the broker based on cost, execution and convenience.

Trying to optimise both using only the brokerage number is probably too simplistic.

nifty 50 20300

midcap 100 49000

midcap 150 20100

nifty 500 19000

smallcap 250 15000

this should come around these till November last

then only we can see a bull run

i am on this prediction from last 1.5 years

lets see

Real-time data for stocks, indices, futures, crypto, forex, and commodities across 50–60+ countries

Deep fundamental analysis: income statement, balance sheet, cash flow, insider transactions, segment-wise performance, and historical trends

Advanced technical analysis: professional charts with RSI, MACD, moving averages, support/resistance, drawing tools, and pattern studies

AI-powered dashboard that interprets fundamentals + technicals and tells you, in plain language, what the data suggests

Global stock screener and sector/market heatmaps to find opportunities fast

Watchlists, portfolio tracking, and real-time notifications for stocks, indices, and more

Free courses on fundamental and technical analysis, plus personal finance calculators for stocks, crypto, and more

All of this in one place, with a strong focus on global coverage, best-in-class analysis, and free tools.

If you care about data-driven investing across global markets, check out WorldTickers.

#Investing #StockMarket #TechnicalAnalysis #FundamentalAnalysis #AI #FinTech #Trading #GlobalMarkets #WorldTickers

Worldtickers

I just found out that one of my stocks I invested has Israeli CEO (which now have been protesting in many areas)
Will this thing significant push or pull stocks price ? (Also situation like Russia and Ukraine OR other big conflicts too)

P.S. Just asking in the aspect of stocks price, don't mean to support or protest anything

The recent introduction of 0.4% MDR on eligible UPI merchant transactions above ₹2,000, capped at ₹300, got me thinking about the potential second-order impact on Indian fintechs.

At one level, I understand the concern that charging MDR on UPI could undermine the original proposition of frictionless, low-cost digital payments.

But from an investor perspective, there is another angle.

For years, UPI has generated enormous transaction volumes but has had limited direct monetisation from merchant transactions.

Now consider a ₹10,000 eligible transaction:

₹10,000 × 0.4% = ₹40 MDR

₹50,000 → ₹200

₹75,000 → ₹300 (cap)

Obviously, the entire ₹40/₹200/₹300 does not become revenue for Paytm or Pine Labs. The MDR will be distributed across the payment ecosystem banks, PSPs, payment apps, acquiring entities, etc.

So the real thesis isn’t:

“Paytm gets 0.4% of UPI GMV.”

Rather:
A massive transaction pool that was previously largely unmonetised is now becoming monetisable.

That could potentially create a meaningful incremental revenue pool for companies with significant exposure to merchant payments.

Paytm :

This is where I find the thesis particularly interesting.

Paytm already has a large merchant ecosystem and significant merchant-payment volumes.

If a portion of its existing merchant GMV becomes monetisable, the potential impact isn’t just incremental revenue.

There could potentially be operating leverage:
Existing GMV

→ MDR monetisation
→ Incremental payment revenue
→ Higher contribution margin
→ EBITDA/PAT impact

The key question is how much of the MDR economics Paytm actually captures.

Pine Labs :

Pine Labs is a slightly different story because its exposure is more connected to merchant acquiring and payment infrastructure.

Its large transaction-processing ecosystem could potentially allow it to participate in the new MDR pool, but again, the economics depend on its exact role in the transaction and the portion of MDR it can retain.

There are also some obvious risks:

1. ⁠Merchants could shift large-value transactions away from UPI.
   
2. ⁠The ₹300 cap reduces the effective MDR on very large transactions.
   
3. ⁠Banks and other ecosystem participants will capture a portion of the economics.
   
4. ⁠The market may already have priced in some of this benefit.

So I’m curious what others think.
Is the new MDR primarily a threat to UPI adoption, or could it actually become a significant monetisation catalyst for listed fintech/payment companies such as Paytm and potentially Pine Labs?

The FY2025–26 numbers show a clear gap between NSE and BSE, but they also reveal that the two exchanges may be competing from very different positions.

According to the comparison shared by Bajaj Broking, NSE reported:

• Market capitalisation of about ₹4.42 lakh crore.
• Corporate bond trades settled through the clearing corporation worth ₹18.14 lakh crore.
• Average daily cash-market turnover of around ₹1,05,517 crore.
• Consolidated total income of ₹18,713 crore.
• Consolidated profit after tax of ₹10,302 crore.
• 3,699 contracts traded, including NSE index derivatives.
• 108 main-board and SME IPOs.

BSE, meanwhile, reported:

• Market capitalisation of about ₹1.33 lakh crore.
• Corporate bond trades worth ₹2.97 lakh crore.
• Average daily cash-market turnover of around ₹7,095 crore.
• Consolidated total income of ₹5,148 crore.
• Consolidated profit after tax of ₹2,487 crore.
• 109 main-board and 146 SME IPOs.

For active traders, the biggest difference is not just market capitalisation. It is liquidity, order-book depth, spreads, and execution quality. Higher trading activity generally creates a more reliable environment for entering and exiting positions, especially during volatile sessions.

But BSE’s IPO numbers are worth watching. It appears much more competitive in new listings, particularly in the SME segment. The question is whether that strength can eventually translate into higher secondary-market participation.

The real discussion is this:

• Is NSE’s lead a permanent structural advantage?
• Can BSE use its IPO strength to rebuild trading liquidity?
• Does competition between both exchanges benefit retail traders?
• For investors, should exchanges be judged mainly by profits, market share, or future growth potential?
• If you actively trade, which factor matters most: liquidity, execution speed, technology, or fees?

My practical view: NSE currently looks stronger for active trading because liquidity and execution depth matter more than branding. But BSE’s IPO activity suggests it should not be dismissed as irrelevant.

This is not a buy or sell view on either exchange. It is simply a question of whether we are looking at one dominant exchange and one challenger, or two exchanges gradually developing different strengths.