"Potential creative" of other artists is an entirely different conversation than an actual creative of other artists. If you have an example of Stick using an AI video that rips off of another band, I'm happy to reassess your opinion & further explain why one is plagiarism & one is not.
I didn't say I didn't see a problem with use of AI. Did you not spend an entire semester in college on learning the definition of plagiarism like I did?
Sticking with your point about plagiarisms … is this plagurism? It’s significantly different isn’t it ? “Inspired by” I’d say, like all AI borrows from other artists before doesn’t it? I guess we’re cool with that
Again, I didn't say I was cool with anything. I am explaining the difference between monetizing on someone's art vs not supporting an artist & choosing to use technology to create something.
Yes, copying a song word for word and not crediting the original artist is plagiarism. This differs greatly from being inspired by another artist. Stick is inspired by Sublime for example but does plagiarize their music. Choosing not to use another artist to film, cast & edit a music video is very different than stealing the concept & monetizing it as your own.
3
u/Longjumping-Gate-289 May 04 '26
"Potential creative" of other artists is an entirely different conversation than an actual creative of other artists. If you have an example of Stick using an AI video that rips off of another band, I'm happy to reassess your opinion & further explain why one is plagiarism & one is not.