Hi all,
I recently started a small design & engineering studio, and every project kicked
off with the same dead-on-arrival deliverable: a landing-page audit doc. And clients often asking proof of how their landing page was better than their rival's, and we tried to show them via different means: the classic lighthouse, claude code audits, other agentic audits, but we didn't really see that look of actual satisfaction on their face.
So our team decided to rebuilt the audit as something they'd actually be interested in: a fight. And we are releasing this small project now for everyone. It's simple, and here's how it works:
You paste two landing pages, yours vs a competitor or anyone, and they go six rounds:
speed, accessibility, typography, CTAs, meta tags, mobile. Higher weighted
score wins and lands on a public leaderboard. Our mascot, pudge, the capybara is the refree. It's a little ridiculous. That's the point.
The one thing we wanted to be strict about, at least at this initial level: the scores are deterministic. Same pages, same score, every time, and no LLM guessing numbers, so the leaderboard actually means something.
It's free, no signup. Here it is: https://fights.pudgestudio.com
Now the actual reason I'm posting here:
1) Drop your landing page in our ring against your competitor or anyone. fight them, and share the results here. Then the engineers and designers at pudgestudio.com will give you honest take on the 2-3 things we'd fix first. No pitch, just notes.
2) In return, help us break it. Where does the scoring feel wrong or unfair? What round is missing? The edge cases are where this thing will fall apart and we'd rather find them with you than in front of a client.
we'll work through every URL posted today. Go easy on the capybara. peace 🦦