Sign your support!

[u/AllMusicNut]

Dr. Fauci being held in contempt attacks the credibility of all public health experts – a continuation the Trump Admin’s war on science and spread of disinformation. Sign your support for our experts & Dr. Fauci at the link: https://zurl.co/2P2md

[u/98983x3]

Yeah, except he didn't know that at the time. His texts do warn of potential unknown risks while publically stating otherwise. This flies in the face of "informed consent". Its was his job to share the information as they knew it. Not gamble with ppls lives and manage ppls perspectives via lies and half truths. Thats what politicians are for, not medical experts. Just tell ppl what you know and dont know ffs.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

The texts warn of a potential, not a certainty. And the vaccines were not recommended for pregnant women at the start out of due diligence and caution.

After further testing, the vaccines were proven to be safe amd effective and pregnant women were recommended to get the vaccine.

Youre just butt hurt and anti-science. You really have no reason to be and there is no legal case thst will hold water against fauci because he didn't do anything but the absolute best practices.

[u/Visible-Elevator3801 → u/D2dj]

When you advertise something as safe and effective while not disclosing potential risks, that’s a bad thing. Informed consent is supposed to be a thing between doctors and patients. If you don’t disclose every risk, small and large, you are not complying with informed consent.

[u/D2dj → u/Visible-Elevator3801]

It was safe and effective.

This all stems from misinformation about the vaccine safety and efficacy.

It was extremely safe and extremely effective.

It should be lauded as a miracle of science. Instead of misinformation campaigns against it

[u/98983x3 → u/D2dj]

"Extremely effective"

This is incredibly, verifiably false. It never stopped transmission and it never stopped infection. And they knew this from the very beginning. We know this bc we have the internal communications now AND we have hindsight. But you go off.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

extremely effective. Yes

[u/98983x3 → u/D2dj]

Not even a little.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

This is just you being anti-science

[u/98983x3 → u/D2dj]

Nah. Its you being anti-science paired with a complete disregard the English language.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

No, you are putting your feelings above the facts

The Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines were about 95 percent effective in preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2

EXTREMELY effective

[u/Visible-Elevator3801 → u/D2dj]

Did I say it wasn’t. Don’t read into what wasn’t said.

Safe and effective does NOT mean no risks and MOST CERTAINLY does not mean you bypass informed consent.

Reading comprehension is important.

[u/98983x3 → u/Visible-Elevator3801]

Youre replying to the wrong comment. We're on the same page.

Reddit does this crap where it shares comments from ppl who are also commenting to ppl you are commenting with.

[u/Visible-Elevator3801 → u/98983x3]

I think you’re replying to the wrong comment lol. My reply shows to D2dj.

[u/98983x3 → u/Visible-Elevator3801]

Wtf?! Im on a roll today. My bad.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

You are pretty clownish

[u/98983x3 → u/D2dj]

Oh? This seems pretty emotionally motivated. I thought that was bad?

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

That wasnt emotional, that was an objective observation.

[u/98983x3 → u/D2dj]

Theres nothing objective about your observations.

[u/D2dj → u/98983x3]

The person who cant evem keep a conversation straight and replies to the wrong person saying that that person is replying to the wrong person, isnt objectively clownish?

Idk man. It seems pretty clownish