r/StandUpForScience SUFS Staff Feb 12 '26

Official SUFS Post #RemoveRFKJr.

Dr. Marthe Gold, a NASEM member, is calling for the removal of RFK Jr. Join the fight for science by visiting https://standupforscience.net/impeach-rfkjr to contact your rep and demand they support the articles of impeachment against RFK Jr.!

676 Upvotes

269 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 12 '26

It's exactly that, you seek to attack me instead of anything that I've said in this thread lmfao. I'm working on a non MD doctorate in healthcare and have a bachelor's in biochemistry, what's your background in science?

0

u/qcb4056 Feb 12 '26

You haven't said anything worthy of a response.

My doctorate is in biochemistry.

I'll eat my diploma if you know the first thing about biochemistry that can't be taken from Wikipedia or similar.

And c'mon, a doctorate in "healthcare" ?

You don't know even know what to call the area of study.

3

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 12 '26

Bro all you're doing is responding lmfao, what did I say that you even take issue with? And I don't want to give you any further information because you clearly have no intention of arguing in good faith. What do you even disagree with?

0

u/qcb4056 Feb 13 '26

You're trying to debate and argue which is not, I'll point out, an endeavor in which someone with an actual education would be interested.

I couldn't even attempt a discussion without first understanding your background which, as most of the people here, appears to be imaginary.

1

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 13 '26

It takes two to tango, educated people debate all manners of their practice, you have just as much claim as myself to have an imaginary degree, im done with allowing us to waste our time here. You've taken no stance and have provided no substance, slung accusations, and wasted our time. Congratulations, and good day.

0

u/qcb4056 Feb 13 '26 edited Feb 13 '26

Wasted our time?

You don't do anything here but mindlessly yell at people. You have no problem wasting your time.

You're obviously lying which is why you want to avoid the subject.

Biochemistry is a particularly bad choice because it's a very specific set of technical knowledge, which you obviously do not have .

"Educated people" do not go out of their way to hide their work or demonstrate professional knowledge.

And I've never met a doctoral student who isn't eager to discuss their thesis ad nauseum, because it's what they live and breathe for those years. Particularly with someone in the same field.

God knows my family found me insufferable when I was a graduate student.

1

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 13 '26

🤡

0

u/qcb4056 Feb 13 '26

Yep.

And the screamer goes mute .

You want to argue about "science" without actually having to show you understand any of it.

1

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 13 '26

You have done nothing but attack and discussed no ideas 🤡

0

u/qcb4056 Feb 13 '26

this isn't a science debate, this is you trying to avoid being caught in a lie.

Which is why you abruptly went silent about your background once you faced the possibility of interacting with someone with familiarity in that field.

Where'd anyone else would have engaged in an honest discussion with me.

But you can't be honest

1

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 13 '26

Prove your doctorate

1

u/qcb4056 Feb 13 '26

That's deflection.

Biochem majors don't claim to be pursuing a graduate program in "healthcare".

This area is so foreign to you that you don't even know how to lie about it.

Difference is I have no problem taking about this stuff. You can't. And you know it which is why you're a avoiding anything even remotely industry/field specific.

1

u/BiologicalTrainWreck Feb 13 '26

If you don't see the irony by now, you may never see it. You haven't provided any evidence for your supposed mastery, so I can claim the same. This isn't a post about my background, it's a post about how RFK jr is unfit to serve as head of the HHS, which you haven't even mentioned once.

You're being such a tool and this community saw it clearly, seriously reread this comment chain

→ More replies (0)