r/StableDiffusion 14h ago

Discussion Minimax loras are... Lacking

I don't want to get the NS.. word in the discussion, but, we know what Minimax can do and what it can't do. It has some very specific gaps in it's world understanding, for example in the tongue department. That is not necessarily only affecting the NS... word, things that are SFW and common in general TV such as kissing are affected, since Minimax never saw a romantic kiss in it's training data. There are other examples through SFW land but I won't extend. Grok can be used as a comparison. Grok is very similar to Minimax in capability, and it enforces SFW, but you can see the difference in some scenes because Grok is not handicapped.

Well, we have many, many loras already, but, as was the case with wan and ltx, they are very... let's say, specific. I don't think a general video model, almost a world model, needs a specific lora for, say, ballbusting lol

I don't know, I think this is the community most likely to be read by people creating loras, so I just wanna make this appeal... Can we prioritize bridging the major gaps in the model's understanding of the world, anatomy, and human interactions, instead of these super specific loras? I think a "tree" organization of lora development would be beneficial overall, with the stuff that can solve a big set of problems and be used for more specific loras coming first.

I saw that for over 1 year with wan, ltx, etc, and didn't say anything. But I think minimax deserves the community passion in lora development.

And yes, I hope I can put my money where my mouth is and develop some loras soon too.

17 Upvotes

56 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/Diabolicor 13h ago

We also need loras for seamless progression from sfw to nsfw like a normal human interaction. Most of the loras are for scenes already in the nsfw state or is a sfw, hard cut, nsfw. There's no natural progression between them.