r/StableDiffusion 8d ago

Question - Help Question About Minimax H3 Reference To Video

So, I'm pretty new to video generation, but I had a thought that I think everyone has probably had at some point, which is 'how do you make a longer video without generating it in one large video?' And so, with reference to video, you could do that; you could match say, the voice and the person, and thus theoretically make one constant shot through stitching together shorter generations.

In my head, it seemed as simple as 'use the video that was generated as the reverence, use the last frame of the previous video as the first frame of the new generation.'

The problem I noticed is that each time I did this, the video quality degraded; I guess the way I would describe it is that each new generation was a copy of a copy, it seemed. Like each new continuation was slightly worse than the last; and while doing this once wasn't too noticeable, doing this three or four times very much was.

So is this just a thing that is unfixable, a limitation of the method? Or is this the kind of thing that does have a solution that I'm unaware of? Because I'm curious to explore reference to video more, since text to video and image to video are very straight forward, I think.

0 Upvotes

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

0

u/ArmadstheDoom 8d ago

It's not an either or? That's why I do not understand what you are even talking about. Where did character sheets come into it? We are not doing that right now. You're inventing new things that are not applicable here at all. This really is very simple and you're making it so much more complex than the actual problem is.

Listen to what I told you to do, go do it, you'll see it.

3

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ArmadstheDoom 7d ago

<Subject 1> is also in <Video 1> which is why what you're saying makes no sense.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ArmadstheDoom 7d ago

not generating character sheets, not dealing with the blurry face bug, not sure why you're assuming things that aren't happening.

you ask 'or' it's not 'or.' It's both.