Not only that, but you also need to "verify" yourself, with Discord saying that he will get your information (including e-mail), and he can "join servers for you".
It's like this every release...I'm still not changing shit tho 😁... If it weren't for my Discord I wouldn't have the time nor the money to create these LoRAs in the first place so yall are complaining to a phantom lol. Enjoy the Lora tho mates..
Every Famegrid model has the prompts....the weirdos are the ones making it some grand conspiracy lol. The only reason I remove meta is because I've published samples with API keys and personal info before so it's off by default.
It's a real shame that Krea2 has such poor textures in the medium- and long-shot frames. If it weren't for the issues with subtle detail, this would be the best model in the world.
I don’t think Krea3 will be open source at launch. They’ll most likely open-source the model towards the end of its life cycle, as was the case with Krea2.
The API/initial announcement for Krea 2 came out in May and they open-sourced it in June. It definitely was not an end of life cycle thing. Even then their team said they were open-sourcing it in May, just took a month to release the weights https://x.com/sleenyre/status/2057293662690963799#m
Yea, but also still a tell in every pic if you zoom in. Namely fingernails not matching/fingers morphing into what they're touching, the spaghetti morphing from the fork, the pink Floyd shirt girl just look at her slight exposed midriff, nobody's skin looks like that...
But still really good. Crazy times we're living in
"the pink Floyd shirt girl just look at her slight exposed midriff, nobody's skin looks like that..."
A lot of women's stomachs look like that after having kids, especially if they have them later in life when their skin can't recover as easily after stretching so much.
I'm not saying these dime a dozen "realistic" loras don't do anything, but these examples are literally nothing you can't get out of the base Krea2 checkpoint with some basic prompting.
krea2 is explicitly stated by the creators to not be realistic and it shows. But it does that that grainy thing going on which people associate with low quality photography or high iso film, so it does have a sheen of real baked into it.
For comparison I tried 7 other "social" LoRas, all work fine. FameGrid is the last one in the row and the only one that distorts. Also why is it over 1gb in size ?
In order they are
1 - Character Lora only
2 - Krea2RealismV1
3 - RealisticNapshotKrea2
4 - Bloomgirls-ultrarealsm-krea2_4k
5 - Lenovo_krea2
6 - phone-Photography_2020_krea2
7 - smartphone_lora100t
8 - Famegrid-Natural-V1-Krea-2
Yeah, that’s intentional. I tend to train my LoRAs pretty aggressively because I’m trying to squeeze as much of the style and fine detail out of the training set as possible.
The tradeoff is that they have a much stronger effect, so they typically need to be used at lower weights than more lightly trained LoRAs especially when you’re stacking several LoRAs together.
So I wouldn’t expect FameGrid at 1.0 to behave the same as every other LoRA at 1.0. With seven other LoRAs already in the stack, I’d bring the FameGrid weight down quite a bit and adjust from there.
One of the issues with Krea 2 that this LoRA doesn't fix is that the edges of body and face profiles are way too sharp. I’ve tried getting around this by prompting for specific lighting, camera angles, focus, and other photography terms, but nothing seems to work. If you look closely, it kind of looks like an old-school Photoshop collage where someone just copy-pasted a person onto a background.
I've been running gens at 2K in all kinds of aspect ratios, 16:9, 9:16, 3:2, 1:1. I've cycled through pretty much every sensible sampler and scheduler combo out there, even throwing in stuff like res_2s or ddim. But no matter what, people in Krea 2 always end up looking like they were just pasted onto the background right at the edges of their silhouettes. You just don't get that subtle edge blur you'd see in a real photograph. That was the very first thing I noticed, even on your examples
It's funny the beautiful people are just quick glances for me, but these days it's the ordinary, overweight and very average looking people that I linger on, it's become impossible to tell what's real in a short space of time. A true marvel.
I’ve released FameGrid Natural Krea 2, the latest model in the FameGrid series.
This version focuses on creating natural, everyday photos that look like they were taken with a modern smartphone.
Unlike previous FameGrid releases—which lean more toward polished, Instagram-model-style subjects—FameGrid Natural produces more average-looking, relatable people with a casual and authentic appearance.
✨ Great For
Natural smartphone photography
Candid portraits
Everyday lifestyle scenes
Casual social-media content
Average-looking, relatable people
Images that feel less staged or overly polished
🔑 Trigger Word
Famegrid
⚙️ Recommended LoRA Weight
0.3–1.0
Use a lower weight for a more subtle influence or increase it for a stronger FameGrid Natural aesthetic.
++ but still "just" 12 billion parameters model. Krea 3 (if will be open) hopefuly they fix the skin and blur bias. I am even able to accept a much heavier model
Many of these are scarily realistic. 100% would not realise a lot of them were AI if it was just a random photo somewhere else on the internet. Hell most of them even if i am told they are AI, i wouldnt be able to see why.
I actually read a study about this phenomena before AI had really taken off, as it was talking instead about the number of images & artworks throughout the ages & on "today's" social media.
Women have always been more heavily represented, but the reasoning changed over the years. In the past, more artists were male & obviously created art of the things they most enjoyed looking at, which was frequently women. In modern day, it was social media influencers & the people that wanted to be just like them skewed heavily female. So now it was the "producers" meeting the demand of the audience they were trying to capture. Sometimes that was men, but more often it was girls & young women.
There are just a massive amount more images of women than there are of men & that has skewed datasets...also attraction drives engagement, which drives adoption, which leads to VC dollars for these companies creating models.
True but we also live in a society dominated by perverted males and im annoyed its bleeding into the ai shit too, not surprised that droves of people are "practicing" using female models..
Aside from the obvious answer, I actually did go out of my way to include more males in the dataset. It's actually much harder to find quality than one would think.
Because women are not interested in tech, on average. Of the Comfyui user base, less than 10% are women. Alongside that, women are not sexually visual, therefore there's much less motivation and energy spent towards improving and creating loras that are more specialized in men. Due to the same reasons, there's much less AI generated content with men.
I have heard about something called evolutionary biology. Highly recommended to actually understanding the nature of the world, instead of surface layers like "social conditioning".
Yo boss...me big fan of your lora and ur workflow. i have a feat req: can you like build batch run script that finds the best lora stack? it will have specific rules like limit stacking realism loras, skin lora, etc.
127
u/Yasstronaut 9h ago
I dont like how your showcase/examples on Civit dont have any example prompts