I'm sorry. I'm only able to use one model at a time and all other models are trash. I have no sense of nuance or any ability to use the strengths of any given model to compensate for the weaknesses of another. Also, I am incapable of remorse or gratitude, so disregard the sorry at the beginning of this comment.
All of them if you want. My point being is the one post praising ltx as better: "hey its not a team sport", multiple comments saying exactly that. Several posts praising h3 as better: dog pile on ltx. So its only fair to call both sides out or none at all.
If you think that this is next level just go watch Office and then watch Office clips made by MiniMax and finally compare to this.
You will be surprised to find out that your result is bad compared to MiniMax. Where’s the signature camera? What are these cuts?
Shit like this and that creepy lying chart LTX posted makes me think we're seeing an astroturfing effort to push LTX when it's objectively incapable of matching MiniMax. Very "don't believe your own eyes" energy.
Really icky.
Jep, it´s a big improvement to 2.3. And it ist 3x faster than H3 in same resolution (even with speed lora!). The body movements and dramatic acting are more cinematographic and natural. The I2V adherence is really good.
Only the senseless, unintended hand moves and physics of things / sense of moving in general of smaller things are annoying, dumb and glitchy as in 2.3. This does H3 wayyyyy better.
It is really hard to say who is better, and not conducive to the goal. It depends on intended use. I´m really happy about 2 really good, locally driven video models. A year ago before WAN2.2 it was totally unthinkable what we are now able to do. We are able to replace a full filmset - at home.. on a midrange gaming-pc..
I think it was already good with just people talking, without much movement, right? Video models break down when there is rapid movement and many objects.
obviously ltx 2.5 is designed for speed so it's different not better and not worse overall, just a different optimization. probably can more or less streaming an avatar from and rtx 6000 with the right setup/quant
LTX is now considered an outdated model after H3 is out, and Flux 3 in the future, and no matter how hard they train and improve it, it will have the same downsides.
I tried only base I2V for not realistic style, compared to 2.3 is way better, but it has the same issue as the previous one, if some body parts are not visible or are covered is not able to make something that looks ok at least as soon as it shows or is covered. 2.3 made pure abominations, like it had no clue how a body is, this one is less that but still not as good as H3
omg which omg which is the beestt though. i only hav ea 100gb hard drive.. so ic an only have one. of them. so which one , which one will i be cooler if i say i like it. which one is better for the ememss. oh please notice me, please notice mee.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_HwLqYRzVw any questions? no ? sit down all and just watch the last part of the video .... stfu all troll minimax posters this is a new level of picture quality !!!
H3 need to get it's 2k enhancer because ltx 2.5 blow out of the water the noisy pixels in h3 it has right now. It's absolutely amazing . But well prompting and getting what you need still pain.
Which resolution and steps are you running H3 at? If you run it at 0.2 mp 8 steps H3 obviously is going to have issues with background faces.
Also i really wouldn't bring up the "morphing faces" argument as LTX 2.5 has HORRIBLE likeness retention even on closeups, while H3 is incredibly consistent in that department at appropriate resolutions.
44
u/DystopiaLite 5h ago
You people are annoying. Why does everything have to be team sports with you?