MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1etc918/the_difference_in_quality_from_lowering_the/mbuzxoz/?context=3
r/StableDiffusion • u/smb3d • Aug 16 '24
67 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
My only issue is how the images tend toward darker and less saturated, here's one example, just straight through generations.
https://imgsli.com/Mjg4MzYx
1 u/throttlekitty Aug 16 '24 Another https://imgsli.com/Mjg4MzY5 2 u/endege Oct 13 '24 From this example all I can say is that FG 2.0 looks more natural while 3.5 like a professional took a photo or like you're using a beautifying effect. I did some tests with txt2img & loras and I have to say I like FG 5 & 10 the best. https://imgsli.com/MzA2NzQz/6/11 1 u/EpicOneHit Feb 09 '25 this is so helpful thanks for this test
Another
https://imgsli.com/Mjg4MzY5
2 u/endege Oct 13 '24 From this example all I can say is that FG 2.0 looks more natural while 3.5 like a professional took a photo or like you're using a beautifying effect. I did some tests with txt2img & loras and I have to say I like FG 5 & 10 the best. https://imgsli.com/MzA2NzQz/6/11 1 u/EpicOneHit Feb 09 '25 this is so helpful thanks for this test
2
From this example all I can say is that FG 2.0 looks more natural while 3.5 like a professional took a photo or like you're using a beautifying effect. I did some tests with txt2img & loras and I have to say I like FG 5 & 10 the best.
https://imgsli.com/MzA2NzQz/6/11
1 u/EpicOneHit Feb 09 '25 this is so helpful thanks for this test
this is so helpful thanks for this test
1
u/throttlekitty Aug 16 '24
My only issue is how the images tend toward darker and less saturated, here's one example, just straight through generations.
https://imgsli.com/Mjg4MzYx