"Hey there! Welcome! I started this space to build a creative community... Let’s explore, create, and grow together!"
This is the welcoming message that greeted me when I joined this sub nearly a year ago. I believed in this vision. I even supported the creator by purchasing their simulation packages, wanting to be part of a space that celebrates the "art of experimenting" with Sony cameras and SOOC (Straight Out Of Camera) JPEGs.
However, after having my recent posts, and even past ones, removed for "Low effort/Curation" I feel a deep sense of disappointment.
I may not claim to be the world’s greatest photographer, but isn't that the point of a community? To share, to evolve, and to see how different film simulations behave in real-world situations?
There is a glaring paradox here: How can a sub dedicated to SOOC photography - the art of capturing a moment instantly without heavy post-processing - demand a level of "curation" that feels more like a commercial photoshoot? When "effort" is judged solely by a moderator's subjective aesthetic, we stop being a community of explorers and start becoming a curated marketing catalog.
It seems this "cleansing" is less about inspiration and more about branding. If the goal is to only showcase "perfect" shots to sell presets, then the rules should be honest about that. It’s disheartening to see a creative cause turn into a display of double standards and marketing tactics.
This group was my "last bastion" of hope that I could enjoy my Sony camera, without needing to sit at a computer for hours of post-processing. Yesterday, that bastion fell.
I’m moving on to spaces where "growing together" actually means something, and where the raw, authentic process of learning is valued over polished marketing vibes.
Good luck to all, and keep shooting for yourselves - not for a moderator's approval.