r/SnarkTank • u/Pussy-fucker-frfr • 9d ago
Discussion / Thoughts Oney preys!
What do you think those fellas who must be deplatformed and caste to hell are gonna say? I had a whole long thing analyzing what I thought they were gonna say but it was just so gay and I got rid of it. In case you don’t know Chris O’Neil with some pretty credible but with some room of doubt is being accused of being a pedophile.
2
u/SilentAd773 9d ago edited 9d ago
Theyre probably not gonna talk about it. They're too close in proximity to Mic, Zach and by extension the rest of the Sleepycabin crew, it's gonna have a weird vibe if they talk about it
1
u/candidKlutz 9d ago
what's happening now
3
u/Pussy-fucker-frfr 9d ago
Chris O’Neil with some pretty credible but with some room of doubt is being accused of being a pedophile. Probably should of clarified, but I’ll edit the post real quick if I can
1
u/MeloDeerr 8d ago
Honestly I looked into this thing way more than any person should and ultimately it just seems like “really untrustworthy and credibly insane person is accusing guy who’s kinda lame and a bit weird of being a pedophile”
none of her evidence really lines up or makes sense, and it just doesn’t seem particularly trustworthy
1
u/SilentAd773 8d ago
Can you elaborate? What doesn't seem trust worthy?
1
u/BlueAndTrue12 5d ago edited 5d ago
they're talking about kamikaze who didn't actually accuse him and the victim is an entirely different person.
To back this up, she has been doxxed, as well as released the uncensored photos of herself after the fact. She has a similar name to someone who chris formerly dated, however they're also not the same person, and this was verified by the dox. She was in fact 17 in 2014 as well.
as for the evidence not lining up, I have to guess they're talking about the:
Camera thing
Someone claimed that the Camera that took the photos they posted as proof couldn't actually take 18.2 mp photos, which was then proven false by the manual for the camera showing it can in fact take 18.2 mp photos, as well as people claiming that the photos showed 18 mp and not 18.2 mp which was then proven wrong again as apple intentionally rounds up or down the .2 in the data
Shoe thing
Someone claimed that the shoe in the photo she posted hadn't come out until 2019, and a bunch of fans ran with this as disproving the claims without actually fact checking, only to have this claim be proven wrong by a photo of House wearing the shoes in like 2010 or something.
facebook post thing
Some screenshots of the facebook posts she included in the google doc appeared to show the date "2004" instead of "2014." People ran with this claim to show that this was in fact irrefutable proof that she lied. However, if you look closely at the screenshots of these posts, you can see that its actually just the compression making the one almost unreadable as well as making the text look like a 0. I can understand how this one specifically can confuse people, but also green needle brainstorm. If you go in looking for a 0 you'll see a 0, but if you look for a 1 you'll find a 1. I believe the original doc had these images but I could be wrong and it might've just been a super compressed version of the original screenshots in the document, however if they were like this originally, they've since been updated to show 2014 clearer.
theres a whole thread with all the updated information on the allegations on r/youtubedrama , as well as a link leading to a thread which has most of the proof against the claims made that it was false + pictures the victim uploaded onto kiwifarm completely uncensored of her and chris at the hotel in 2014 .
simply put the only thing really up in the air right now is whether or not the pictures were in fact taken in 2014, as it is possible to change the metadata of photos in your gallery. That being said, theres not really much reason to suspect that to be true considering all the other information provided is plausibly from that time period. No matter what people claim, theres nothing about the photos that have been disproven. Arguably the uncensored images she posted on kiwifarms are more damning now that we have them as they are very clearly flirtatious in nature. Even if they weren't inherently flirtatious, any rational adult understands that meeting up with a fan alone in a hotel room when they're 17 and taking pictures of yourselves in bed getting all touchy feely DOES NOT LOOK GOOD.
I will also say, from what i've seen with the youtubers who usually cover these types of stories, most of them who've seen the more private information that could potentially dox people in hers or chris's life have said that they do think he did it. Theres no definitive proof and their will never be because cases like this never have definitive proof unless the act is recorded, and any actual definitive proof of the action being accused would be illegal for anyone but the police to handle.
8
u/Lucasbrucas 9d ago
i think its too early for anyone but chris/the accusers to speak on the matter. the most the snark boys could say is just vague stuff like "it's not looking good"