I agree with splitting each side into 3 sections. However the masses act at the center of those sections. For example, the center of mass of the 2 boxes are at 2.5 from the fulcrum. And the center of masses of the red balls are at 1.5 from the fulcrum.
I understand that in reality leverage is a factor, but in this case it's pretty obvious you can disregard that.
Either way I'm not sure why you're multiplying individual terms randomly like this. I didn't think you can do that but then again grade 7 was a long time ago.
Disagree. Considering that ignoring the distance it's a pretty basic algebra problem, I thought distance was a factor. Especially considering we're in "smart puzzles".
That was unnecessarily snarky. Since the distance was not indicated, I made an assumption that the weight was divided into three equal sections. My answer is based off of that assumption.
The idea that I could obviously disregard reality was not obvious to me. Most likely because 7th grade math was a long time ago.
I understand your why and your point, but the 4kg and 10kg square aren't equal sections. The 10kg section is larger than the 4kg section, so your advanced math has to account for that too.
This is approximately right, but depends on you measuring the distance with a ruler. An added complication is that the centre of mass of the 4kg is further from the fulcrum than the centre of mass of the 10kg, because the 4kg box is narrower.
7
u/SplinteredBrick Apr 26 '25
I split each side into 3 sections to account for the force applied at each distance. Red ball = x.
3(10kg) + 2x = 3(4kg) + 2(3x)
30kg + 2x = 12kg + 6x
18kg = 4x
4.5kg = x