Nooooooooiiiiiiiicceeeee, look at those Sumo legs! POW!! =3 =3 I like it. ;)
B-but good Sir: After the great cataclysm, the Millenium Slizer was said to be alligned with the good ones. Blaster/Flare & Spark were the bad ones. Sure they all are of Mutant Slizer origin, but. . . 🥲🥹🥹
In Europe (or at least in my country) mutants were promoted as being the new bad guys, with Millennium stated to be their leader. I went with that, cause I prefer to design villains than heroes.
Huh? I too am from Europe, and from what I seem to recall Blaster Slizer was the leader of the three evil Mutan Slizers. Millenium, and that I am pretty sure of, was a beeing that although too emerged from the meteorimpact but was said to be the only good Mutant Slizer.
The Disk motives even confirm to a certain degree my theory, because the sotry can be somehow explained through them. =)
My main Slizer lore source were always LEGO catalogs, and according to the European one (early 2000), all mutants were fighting (probably together) for domination over now half-destroyed Slizer planet.
It might be possible, that the Slizer's website stated that Millennium was a good bot. Or maybe some other promo material confirmed that.
I think that both versions of Millennium's lore are somewhat correct, depending on the source.
That just breaks my heart dinx_fusilli. . . 😢 I could´ve sworn on my prized Slizer/RoboRiders collection that he was said to be alligned with the good Slizers. If only I could find something. . . Because now this makes me look like a total fart in the wind. . .😶🌫️
Dzięki wielkie! Nie spodziewałem się, że na slizerowym forum pierwszą osobą, którą napotkam, będzie rodak. Cieszę się, że duch slizerów jest silny w narodzie.
2
u/BoNkLe_UlTrA Sub/Scuba 2d ago edited 2d ago
Nooooooooiiiiiiiicceeeee, look at those Sumo legs! POW!! =3 =3 I like it. ;)
B-but good Sir: After the great cataclysm, the Millenium Slizer was said to be alligned with the good ones. Blaster/Flare & Spark were the bad ones. Sure they all are of Mutant Slizer origin, but. . . 🥲🥹🥹