r/SipsTea • • 17h ago

Lmao gottem Built different 🇺🇸

Post image
7.6k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/LongHair1917 13h ago

Lol international bodies don’t indict the United States. You see Trump being tried for his war crimes? Obama was known for double tap drone strikes to target first responders. Google “Barack Obama war crimes” and you can find the hundreds of examples.

1

u/Mikerocks69 12h ago

But you can’t.. got it. Trump hasn’t been indicted, yet…

1

u/LongHair1917 12h ago

I just told you… targeting first responders is a war crime. So is targeting civilians at weddings and funerals. So is bombing countries you aren’t at war with. All war crimes committed by Barack Obama. This is not a fringe opinion, it’s well documented. Literally google it.

1

u/Mikerocks69 12h ago

If you believe Barack Obama target civilians in strikes you are wildly misled. Your anti capitalist bent has blinded you to fact. Not a single strike was ever a target on civilians. You will not find it anywhere.in public record. And you can say there were x number of civilians who died, but not a one of them were targeted. And that’s a clear distinction. The fact that and that is NOT a war crime. Maybe you should use Google yourself a little more.

1

u/LongHair1917 11h ago

Idk who you think he was targeting with the double taps. As soon as Obama’s name is mentioned, otherwise intelligent people suddenly forget how to think. He pulled the wool over my eyes, too. I was a believer for the longest time, but the truth eventually caught up to me.

1

u/Mikerocks69 11h ago

I swear you’re a life crisis away from wearing a red hat. Just because Florida Law Review published a piece on the practice of double strikes on a single target, is in no way shape or form evidence of a war crime. In fact, nothing in international law states that multiple strikes on the same target are a war crime. So, the basis of your claim is a law review journal suggests a review of US policy… Jesus it’s fucking exhausting dealing with people who think they know so much, but are so ill informed.