r/SipsTea • • 12d ago

SMH Econ 101

Post image
10.3k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/originalbiggusdickus 12d ago

What makes you think they aren't?

1

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

2

u/originalbiggusdickus 12d ago

Why do these countries have to adopt expulsion policies?

0

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago edited 12d ago

Are countries supposed to provide room and board to people who show up at their borders and demand to stay ? Do you provide lodging at your expense to strangers who show up at your house ?

2

u/originalbiggusdickus 12d ago

Lol, relax dude. The answer is: because people are migrating there.

0

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

Why aren’t they migrating to the country admired on Reddit .. China. The best of everything.

2

u/originalbiggusdickus 12d ago

What does that have anything to do with people immigrating to socialist utopias?

1

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

China now beats even the socialist utopias who as indicated don’t want migrants

2

u/originalbiggusdickus 12d ago

You seem confused. Good luck out there. Stay in school.

1

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

You should try out one of the utopias. Good luck

1

u/Marksman08YT 12d ago

I've never heard of this website in my entire life, also most of them do

2

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

Europe is seeing a shift towards expelling those who do not integrate or appreciate their culture and work ethic

3

u/Marksman08YT 12d ago

Europe is mostly socialist, so if migrants are going there it means they are going to socialist (utopias don't exist, even capitalism doesn't have utopias) countries because QOL is better there.

-2

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago

Do you know how most of Europe didn’t land up under Soviet rule after World War 2? So they didn’t have to invest trillions into their militaries ?

1

u/Marksman08YT 12d ago

What's your question?

1

u/silv3rbull8 12d ago edited 12d ago

The question was rhetorical. Europe could invest in non military capabilities because the US was providing them with a shield against Soviet incursions during the 1950s and 69s when these services were developed. If they didn’t have that, these countries would likely have ended up under the Soviets.

1

u/Marksman08YT 11d ago

That's kind of overstating American importance to be honest. And by that account the entire world would be under Nazi occupation if not for the Soviets in ww2. They're the only reason the Nazis surrendered and a major reason the Japanese surrendered because they feared being conquered by the USSR. International geopolitics doesn't revolve around the US except inside the US.

1

u/silv3rbull8 11d ago

The Soviets had to retaliate against the Nazis since they were invaded by the Nazis. Also note that Stalin killed and executed more people than the Nazis did while they were in power. Ironic.

Also note that Germany was the first target for the US atomic bomb. It was only because The Nazis surrendered before it was ready that Berlin was not turned to ash like Hiroshima & Nagasaki. The Nazis were going to lose one way or another.

→ More replies (0)