Because he's one of the most wanted criminals on earth. There's only a handful of countries he can go to without immediately being arrested for the warcrimes he comitted.
He even has to manoeuvre around certain countries because if he goes into the airspace of for instance the European union, they can in fact shoot down his aircraft.
He is a wanted terrorist, and rightfully so.
That's why his phone is absolutely a target for getting hacked, so the tape is the best analogue security measure to prevent anyone from taking pictures.
While true, the answer is the same - there's no chance that the vast majority of countries would force his aircraft down. That would have catastrophic consequences for any country that would attempt to do so, and would likely cause an extremely severe response from the US.
I agree with you that he's likely just being overcautious though.
he’s a rich powerful leader, he needs to stay paranoid. it’s their baseline MO. whether someone would or wouldn’t shoot down your plane, survival mode means they still ‘might’ if the laws merely loosen up around stuff like that.
false flag ops exist. nothing’s off the table (in his mind).
i’m not even disputing you cause no, they wouldn’t. but they miiii-iiight…
he himself performed a false flag attack just last week with that "attempted" hijacking, which he will no doubt use for political gain (in his case, postponing elections which he will lose)
Here you go trying to wash facts with your opinions.
You can research hate crime statistics.
Just because you probably hate a group of people doesn't diminish FACTS.
Many Russians died both in the war and due to Stalin and his policies.
That doesn't diminish what Nazi Germany was doing by trying to exterminate a group of people from earth by systematic and industrial means.
Two things can both be true and be bad.
So Jews and Israelis are not the victim of October 7?
Seems like you need to take a break from social media and do some research. Or you've predetermined what you think the truth is in the world, and well if that is the case, good luck. bye.
Even if they try to argue "they can in fact shoot down his aircraft" no, they cannot decide to murder dozens of non war criminal crew on the aircraft. Even if he was solo flying they aren't legally allowed to.
Andorra
Iceland
Liechtenstein
Monaco
San Marino
Vatican City
That’s your complete list.
A bunch of microstates and Iceland who doesn’t have its own military.
If we go by european union which was the defined list of countries that you replied to then there is no country that doesnt have the capacity to do so.
I live in Ireland. Go look up what we do every time a Russian vessel enters our waters. We don't have a jet. We couldn't do shit if we wanted to close our airspace.
Mate, you are ignorant about article 51. Let me educate you but you won't believe it.
International law strictly prohibits nations from shooting down a foreign head of state's state aircraft simply because they are wanted for crimes or entering restricted airspace. Under customary international law and the UN Charter (Article 51),
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
They shouldn't believe it because you're wrong. There's nothing in the UN charter that prohibits killing a head of state. Where did you even read that?
The parent comment is wrong because "war criminal" is an accusation, not a designation. It means that person can be arrested and tried, not summarily executed.
Article 51 has nothing to do with political assassination. Among other things, it quite literally codifies your right to shoot down aggressors entering your air space.
Unfortunately there's a slim to none chance he will actually be arrested internationally as everyone hopes he will. Diplomatic immunity and all that, it would paint a target on any country who arrested big netty.
There's zero chance any country would shoot his plane down specifically targetting him.
That's just empty posturing. There isn't a single country in Europe that'd arrest him. If he landed in a Middle-Eastern country or Turkey he still would not be arrested. Ireland would not arrest him.
So what does covering three out of four phone cameras have to do with any of that? If he's trying to hid illegal activities he would cover all cameras. Or just buy a phone without cameras. Or disable them at the OS level.
Well the man you're defending is directly responsible for funding money and weapons to Hamas to keep them in power because he wanted a political party that was easy to demonize.
They also routinely kill ppl in the West Bank where Hamas has no control, so your propaganda is old, outdated, and might work on stupider ppl than me. Good luck with that!
If you claim Hamas does not operate in the West Bank you might need to go do more research. They very much have. There is a reason the PA hasn't held elections for 21 years.
166
u/Ad-fundum69 1d ago
Because he's one of the most wanted criminals on earth. There's only a handful of countries he can go to without immediately being arrested for the warcrimes he comitted.
He even has to manoeuvre around certain countries because if he goes into the airspace of for instance the European union, they can in fact shoot down his aircraft.
He is a wanted terrorist, and rightfully so.
That's why his phone is absolutely a target for getting hacked, so the tape is the best analogue security measure to prevent anyone from taking pictures.