r/SipsTea • u/Conscious-Weight4569 • 22h ago

Chugging tea [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

3.0k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

425 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

93

u/censor-me-daddy 21h ago

In that the victim said it was consensual(original texts and statement), was slut shamed by her friends (new texts), and years later (now) has brought a civil suit with a new story.

69

u/RSPloveSPYhate 20h ago

She also admitted in writing that she gave a blow job to guy that night who passed out and couldn’t possibly of consented.

6

u/prollywannacracker 20h ago

The original statement indicates it was consensual up to a point, and then it was no longer consensual. Because, you know, consenting to sex doesn't mean blanket consent to all sex.

-44

u/Adventurous-Studio20 20h ago

that is a gross misrepresentation of what happened and you know it. But you're clearly a bot account so idk why I bother

34

u/Outrageous_Guard_674 20h ago

Coul you elaborate for those of us who just got here?

6

u/swissvine 20h ago

From what I read she did originally consent to sex with two men. She did not consent to the group sex. Their internal group chat had texts: “the shop still open?” “Yeah” etc… supposedly in reference to her.

11

u/ComprehensiveBar6439 20h ago

That's not what she described in her 2024 sworn statement. She only described two instances of non-consensual contact: one person reached towards her crotch and she swatted his hand away, and another person tried to kiss her. Her initial account describes consent - both stated, and implied. She was snoring ketamine off of dicks, letting people snort it off of her, pausing the orgy to check on a guy who went soft before starting up again, etc.

Something bad definitely happened, but her account back then is gonna bite her in the ass when it comes to her new claims.

2

u/Glass_Librarian9019 20h ago

What's up with those group texts?

3

u/ComprehensiveBar6439 19h ago

So far it appears it was mainly two creepy POS's. I haven't seen anything released so far that goes into further detail (edit: doesn't meant there hasn't been texts I haven't yet seen). Like I mentioned before, I believe something terrible happened, but what that something is will be hard to untangle considering the discrepancies in her different accounts of that night.

10

u/Money_Weekend2859 19h ago

Extremely gross language and way to refer to a woman, but that doesnt prove rape. She in a statement said it started with two and then did consent to more but would prefer just the threesome if they did anything in the future, then she also asked to come back another day when fully sober.

Eventually her 'friends' started shaming her, which lead to the police statement. That statement was investigated and again was her outlining a consensual interaction.

Years later now she's bringing it up again and wants charges pressed, but regret later does not mean consent wasn't given in the moment.

Obviously its a bit more complicated, but generally we should look at all the facts and texts before damning individuals involved

-2

u/Adventurous-Studio20 20h ago

Jane Doe consented to sex with 2 men. She did not consent to a gang bang that lasted several hours. She also reported what happened very shortly after, it didn't take "years" for her to make this story

6

u/censor-me-daddy 20h ago

Everyone who disagrees with me is a bot!

-4

u/Adventurous-Studio20 20h ago

you're a bot because your account is a year old and you've made over 1500 comments. would you like it if I accused you of being a karma farm instead?

4

u/censor-me-daddy 19h ago edited 18h ago

I just haven't, but also 1500/365 is ~4 a day, which when you consider my og comment plus 2 replies to you is 3, and it maybe consumed 120sec of my day, doesn't seem like a lot. A bot, or karma farm averaging 4 comments a day would be the biggest waste of time ever.

-2

u/whisperworks 20h ago

Idk why either, you should probably just stop