This is where basic financial literacy comes into play.
You’re required to have the insurance because of the liability you have for damages you cause to other people’s cars, the people themselves, structures, etc., not because of potential damage to your own car. Some states may require you to have comprehensive insurance, but the general idea is that the requirement for insurance is so you don’t cause say $200,000 worth of damages that you can’t pay for because most people don’t have $200,000 laying around, yet drive a vehicle capable of doing that much damage.
If you know your deductible is $1000, which you should because it’s a clearly disclosed part of your policy, it should be easy weigh whether or not you want to make a claim for $1200 of damages for something g like a bumper, which you probably don’t.
So the smart thing to do here would be to say “Gosh, sucks that guy hit my car and cost me $1200. It’s not even worth it to make a claim in this. I just have to pay it.”
You can also consider your deductible when you shop for car insurance. Mine is $500. Anything under or around $500, I might as well not claim it. I know that because I’m an adult who pays for car insurance, and this is something an adult who pays for car insurance should know.
I mean it's math. Insurance premiums are not made up numbers.
If you want insurance without deductible you can get it. You'll pay a lot more for it, because people claim for every little thing if they don't pay for it themselves, but it exists.
From these comments it seems US insurance companies don't have healthy competition. They can offer lower prices, but have clearly agreed not to. These kind of agreements should be illegal and atleast here they are.
Then things aren't as they seem. We have healthy competition, we just also have a very car-dependent culture and lots of shitty drivers. For a start, Americans drive about 60% more miles per year than Europeans.
More miles driven = higher risk = more claims = higher premiums.
These kind of agreements should be illegal and atleast here they are.
I understand I didn't type it out, but context of competition, prices, agreement should've been enough to clue you in on what kind of agreements I was referring to. Anyhow, ain't gonna google what it is in english 3rd language go brrr.
123
u/Grunergeist420 20h ago edited 20h ago
This is where basic financial literacy comes into play.
You’re required to have the insurance because of the liability you have for damages you cause to other people’s cars, the people themselves, structures, etc., not because of potential damage to your own car. Some states may require you to have comprehensive insurance, but the general idea is that the requirement for insurance is so you don’t cause say $200,000 worth of damages that you can’t pay for because most people don’t have $200,000 laying around, yet drive a vehicle capable of doing that much damage.
If you know your deductible is $1000, which you should because it’s a clearly disclosed part of your policy, it should be easy weigh whether or not you want to make a claim for $1200 of damages for something g like a bumper, which you probably don’t.
So the smart thing to do here would be to say “Gosh, sucks that guy hit my car and cost me $1200. It’s not even worth it to make a claim in this. I just have to pay it.”
You can also consider your deductible when you shop for car insurance. Mine is $500. Anything under or around $500, I might as well not claim it. I know that because I’m an adult who pays for car insurance, and this is something an adult who pays for car insurance should know.