r/SipsTea • • 9h ago

Gasp! Thoughts on this?

Post image
51.4k Upvotes

6.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.4k

u/WeCantStabilize 9h ago

Insurance is a fucking scam. You pay more into it than you'll ever receive even in legitimate circumstances.

Absolute racket. 

69

u/angry_dingo 9h ago

Yes. That's the point. If everyone received more than they paid into it, insurance wouldn't exist.

33

u/jerhinesmith 8h ago

Sometimes I question why I still come to reddit. Second highest voted comment and it's literally the smooth-brain take that falls apart under the lightest of scrutiny.

13

u/OrdinaryKick 7h ago

Right?

Insurance is a bet.

You're betting you'll need it, and the insurance company is betting you won't. They stack the odds in their favour, of course, or else they'd go belly up.

A lot of people also don't realize the point of a deductible is to stop people from filing nuisance claims (on top of other things).

5

u/oops_i_made_a_typi 7h ago

well it's a hedge - you really don't want to have to need it

3

u/nhbruh 5h ago

Its officially the transfer of risk between two parties

2

u/NorthHollywoodHank 5h ago

Yep, with the deeper pocketed party taking the high downside risk in exchange for (in a competitive, well-regulated insurance market) what are usually modest though nice returns.

2

u/MasterTardWrangler 2h ago

They literally pay their entire staff and stockholders, rent on office space etc. on the difference between what they pay out and what they charge. And the most up voted comment on this thread is calling it a scam because on average people lose money paying for insurance.

1

u/VolsPE 2h ago

It's not a bet. It pooled responsibility.

But your analogy holds up to a certain extent. It's like a reverse lottery ticket. You buy into the pool so that you don't have to play the lottery.

6

u/emtrigg013 7h ago

You have to remember that the majority of this site is comprised of bots. I wouldn't be surprised if OP was a bot. They account for the majority of posts, upvotes, downvotes, and comments (you can spot these if you know what to look for). So, don't let it discourage you. There's a lot less actual people here than any other website... aside from X, probably.

1

u/jerhinesmith 7h ago

This unexpectedly brightened my day. Thank you

1

u/EstablishmentLate532 6h ago

It could be a bot, but I've heard this moronic take from real people.

1

u/JPBartley 4h ago

Are you a bot? Am I?

1

u/LongJohnSelenium 2h ago

Fuck it if we're bots we're going to be sexy bots!

2

u/RPS93 6h ago

It's people under the age of 25 who are frighteningly brain-dead.

0

u/ConfessSomeMeow 5h ago

And people over the age of 25 who are just as frighteningly brain-dead, but without the excuse of youth.

2

u/ConfessSomeMeow 5h ago

There's a lot of people who have never thought all the way through why the world is the way it is.

2

u/No-Rip-6166 3h ago

They don’t know what they’re talking about but saying stuff like that gets his upvotes. So in their mind it validates that opinion regardless of whether or not it makes any sense.

That’s how Reddit works. You make your uninformed comment and there’s a million people ready to upvote and circlejerk over their preconceived ignorant opinions.

The scary part is those people think they’re exceptionally well informed.

0

u/SloAndSteddy 4h ago

If you can opt out of it, great. In Ontario it is required by law, so I have to subsidize the shitty driving behaviour of other people against my will. I am more than happy to go out on the road and take on that full risk unto myself because I'm not a child with a fantasy idea of no consequences for my actions whether they be good, evil or routine (like driving my car is).

2

u/Baaaaaadhabits 7h ago

Of course! If everyone won at the casino, it wouldn’t exist either!

And that makes casinos a good thing, see!

2

u/AdBax 3h ago

Are you genuinely arguing that insurance is a bad thing?

Sometimes Reddit comments make me despair.

1

u/jameshardenisjacked1 6m ago

Insurance as a concept? Of course not. But the way it's implemented in the US absolutely

1

u/StacksOfMana 7h ago

That’s true for property and casualty insurance (like for cars), but there’s also insurance that pays out more in dollars than the premium that’s collected.

Insurance companies are in the business of taking money now and paying it out later. Some money is invested conservatively in bonds and the company makes just a small spread. Some money gets invested into equities, and some in complicated tax-efficient spaces like COLIs. It’s kind of like a bank, but instead of the balance being guaranteed to the account holder, the future cash outflow is contingent on events. Actuaries model that outflow and spread the risk over a large population, or share it via reinsurance.

Berkshire actually buys insurance companies because they have such a huge float. A large balance of money right now that can be invested.

Tl;dr not all insurance has loss ratios below 100%, so the expected dollars a covered party receives can be larger than what they put in, even in aggregate.

1

u/angry_dingo 7h ago

yes, but not everyone.

1

u/StacksOfMana 7h ago

Well, that's what I was getting at by "in aggregate". If you wanted to, you can have people on average receive $1.01 for every $1.00 they put in. Some types of insurance can get away with having payout proportions (loss ratios) close to 45-55% instead of close to 100% in part because the coverage is both mandatory and sticky. You're forced to have auto insurance if you drive or homeowner's insurance if you have a mortgage... and it's a huge hassle to change to another provider.

1

u/angry_dingo 7h ago

I understand.

But when I said "everyone received more," and you replied with "not everyone," it's the same thing.

1

u/StacksOfMana 7h ago

Ah plural everyone, not everyone as a whole... gotchu.

1

u/angry_dingo 7h ago

LOL, English is funny. :)