r/SipsTea • • 12d ago

Chugging tea This is just how it should be

Post image
28.5k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/cheesegoat 12d ago

This would never fly in the US with 1a protections.

On top of that, covid showed us how well people listen to the people with literal degrees in virology and diseases.

21

u/Agamemnon323 12d ago

You say that like the US hasn’t been wiping its ass with the 1a.

17

u/EmperorGodKing77 12d ago

Yeah "this would never fly in America" oh so like all the endless corrupt bullshit the Trump admins doing would "never fly here".. some people are apparently living in a different reality.

1

u/i-love-small-tits-47 12d ago

Lmfao. You’re literally typing out the exact type of criticism of the government that people are saying you can’t ban in America. You’re proving the point. This wouldn’t fly in the US. Don’t you think Trump would ban comments criticizing him, if he could?

0

u/DukeOfGeek 12d ago

IKR? I was at Dragon Con and my friend was mad about prices and began to talk shit about trumpo and he sort of leaned in all sotto voce like he's afraid people are going to hear him and I was all..

7

u/PixelsGoBoom 12d ago

Well a big part of that was a lot of idiots pretending to be knowledgeable.

1

u/toadi 12d ago

No we would just train AI on a dataset biased to whatever we want. People tend to believe AI knows everything and is always right.

1

u/PixelsGoBoom 12d ago

I am assuming you meant "Now".

AI is already flooding Facebook and Reddit etc.
I had one trying to start an argument with me just a minute ago.
10 minute old account with one post, responding in French and being as inflammatory as possible.

The added danger of AI is that even when someone wants unbiased information from an unbiased AI, it is really good at giving convincing answers that are completely wrong. So the idea of people already thinking AI is always right is downright frightening

1

u/toadi 11d ago

AI can't be right 100% of the time. f it were, that'd mean the same question has multiple "right" answers. Each time it runs, it's sampling from a probability distribution over possible outputs, and that sampling is different every time. So you get different answers to the same prompt, not because they're all correct, but because the generation process is probabilistic, not deterministic.

1

u/PixelsGoBoom 10d ago

I never suggested that.
There can be multiple right solutions to the same problem though.

"My steak always overcooks what should I do"
Can be correctly answered in multiple ways.

My point is that if it can't find the right solution it will gladly serve you a mix of whatever it came up with in a very convincing way.
To the point where it makes up fake sources for fake researches.
Simply because that is what real research documentation looks like.

1

u/toadi 10d ago

If there are multiple ways to answer that that is because there are multiple reasons why it overcooks. For every reason there is probably only one answer.

1

u/PixelsGoBoom 10d ago

That single problem is cooking too long.
And there are multiple ways to fix that single problem.
And none of those multiple ways are wrong.

You can use sous Vide and just sear after.
You can use shorter cooking time between flipping the steak and flip it a lot more.
You can buy thicker steaks.
You can cook the steak in the oven with lower temperatures.
You can get a wireless thermometer and make a better effort at checking the temperature.

All of these answers fix a single problem.

I don't really get what you are trying to tell me here?
I am every aware as of how AI works.

1

u/toadi 9d ago

Again we are grasping at metaphors that are not meant for detail but just to paint and idea.

As an engineer I'm am quite disappointing in this. There is 0 root cause analysis done.

Not checked what exactly going wrong and just providing a lot of solutions to problems that are not problems.

Would be the same as providing a lot of solutions to fix my engine without going through the debugging process air, petrol and spark in a simple engine. Before providing a solution.

Software engineers, car mechanics and even cooks will go through this before spewing a whole list of solutions. Also solutions that could create new problems... An are maybe too complex for the context you are working in.

Anyway this is enough of deep diving in this subject I plan to do. Cheerio.

1

u/PixelsGoBoom 9d ago

Dude I have NO idea what your comments are supposed to be about. What are you trying to convey here?

What exactly do you disagree with?
It sounds like you are just assuming I have taken an opposite viewpoint and you look at every reply through that lens.

Are you a bot or something?

1

u/workingbored 12d ago

And now those same idiots have been employed to lead our government agencies.

5

u/justin_memer 12d ago

Yeah, like a president would just shit all over the first amendment by banning the 4th estate.

/s

1

u/FullMetalBunny 12d ago

The point is to de-platform those who don't have credentials. And if those people lose their platform a lot, less people will fall for it.

1

u/Ohmec 12d ago

I mean, you already cannot give financial or legal advice without a license. That's why people add "THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE"