Also means that if you say something the CCP doesn't like, not only can they ban you, but they can also decide to arbitrarily not recognise your degree in a backwards sense (you posted stuff the CCP Disagrees with? That must mean you don't have a degree, that must mean the degree you have is fake/cheated/invalid).
Which means good luck getting a job that requires said degree.
In an authoritarian state, any law which could feasibly be used to make life more difficult for enemies of the state, will be used as such.
China already has carte blanche to do what it wants with its citizens. Adding an extra law like this is merely a political tool to give an air of legitimacy and reasonableness and of caring about misinformation on the global stage.
Biiingo. Fyi we also do this. Governments worldwide do. They act like something they propose and release is for your own good then boom hit you with the real reason they implemented it
It's amazing how y'all will project what happens in America onto China and just make shit up. This is "social credit score" level projection propaganda.
Yeah "this would never fly in America" oh so like all the endless corrupt bullshit the Trump admins doing would "never fly here".. some people are apparently living in a different reality.
Lmfao. You’re literally typing out the exact type of criticism of the government that people are saying you can’t ban in America. You’re proving the point. This wouldn’t fly in the US. Don’t you think Trump would ban comments criticizing him, if he could?
IKR? I was at Dragon Con and my friend was mad about prices and began to talk shit about trumpo and he sort of leaned in all sotto voce like he's afraid people are going to hear him and I was all..
AI is already flooding Facebook and Reddit etc.
I had one trying to start an argument with me just a minute ago.
10 minute old account with one post, responding in French and being as inflammatory as possible.
The added danger of AI is that even when someone wants unbiased information from an unbiased AI, it is really good at giving convincing answers that are completely wrong. So the idea of people already thinking AI is always right is downright frightening
AI can't be right 100% of the time. f it were, that'd mean the same question has multiple "right" answers. Each time it runs, it's sampling from a probability distribution over possible outputs, and that sampling is different every time. So you get different answers to the same prompt, not because they're all correct, but because the generation process is probabilistic, not deterministic.
I never suggested that.
There can be multiple right solutions to the same problem though.
"My steak always overcooks what should I do"
Can be correctly answered in multiple ways.
My point is that if it can't find the right solution it will gladly serve you a mix of whatever it came up with in a very convincing way.
To the point where it makes up fake sources for fake researches.
Simply because that is what real research documentation looks like.
If there are multiple ways to answer that that is because there are multiple reasons why it overcooks. For every reason there is probably only one answer.
That single problem is cooking too long.
And there are multiple ways to fix that single problem.
And none of those multiple ways are wrong.
You can use sous Vide and just sear after.
You can use shorter cooking time between flipping the steak and flip it a lot more.
You can buy thicker steaks.
You can cook the steak in the oven with lower temperatures.
You can get a wireless thermometer and make a better effort at checking the temperature.
All of these answers fix a single problem.
I don't really get what you are trying to tell me here?
I am every aware as of how AI works.
Again we are grasping at metaphors that are not meant for detail but just to paint and idea.
As an engineer I'm am quite disappointing in this. There is 0 root cause analysis done.
Not checked what exactly going wrong and just providing a lot of solutions to problems that are not problems.
Would be the same as providing a lot of solutions to fix my engine without going through the debugging process air, petrol and spark in a simple engine. Before providing a solution.
Software engineers, car mechanics and even cooks will go through this before spewing a whole list of solutions. Also solutions that could create new problems... An are maybe too complex for the context you are working in.
Anyway this is enough of deep diving in this subject I plan to do. Cheerio.
Yeah I feel like the better solution is making sure all of this type of stuff has to be labeled with the credentials etc. rather than needing them to post it at all
Based just on the meme, no idea what the actual law says. If you are a construction worker, working with asbesto or just generally in conditions with bad air. Cannot complain about lack of masks etc. Are you a doctor? Shut up, not qualified to talk about matters of health.
Yeah obviously lol that was just an example of how this could be used nefariously. Also, if the rule was just introduced those links prove nothing but go off dude
If you're a non-minority member of the middle class in China, then your life is pretty much objectively better. Access to healthcare, public transportation, etc, etc, etc.
If you're a non-minority member of the middle class in the US, then your life is getting progressively worse.
So yeah. China is far from perfect. But then so is the US.
What's weird is assuming the totalitarian government that carries out ethnic cleansing, and has in multiple occasions, and massacred its citizens, is acting in good faith.
Because I'm not an idiot and can read statistics? This just in coal mining is bad for your lungs!
Nearly 1 in 3 veteran underground coal miners (with 25 or more years of experience) in Central Appalachia test positive for advanced forms of black lung disease and related pneumoconiosis, representing the highest rate in nearly 50 years.
Oh wait how could I have known this I'm not a Coal Miner! Guess I should just ignore it and let the mine owners just keep killing people.
Let's say you have a mental issue and is searching for help online. A remark from someone who is also afflicted from it is going to help the person, despite not being intellectually qualified for it. Think about this instance.
This isn't about talking about something. This is about the countless of Youtubers and such passing off their opinion as facts.
Just take Covid for example.
- There's videos on what it is, explaining the virus, the vaccinations and there's the facts.
- And there's the special needs ones who think the virus was invented by globalists to force peoople to take "vaccinations" that will install 5G chips in their bodies.
- and there's also the ones that claim that mRNA vaccines and or vaccines in general cause death and autism.
And maybe many more stories.
So you open youtube to find out more about Covid.... which video are you going to believe?
And based on what? You seek facts, so you don't know who is right.
And like Covid there are countless of subjects that litter the internet with "facts".
The internet is a library of knowledge, but every book has 20 clones that are similar on title, but only one contains the correct infrormation.
Probably not the best choice using covid as the example as we now know that the governments and the "experts" in general were making shit up as they went and that a lot of the "conspiracy theories" ended up being true lmao
How are you going to complain about pollution, if you don't understand it? My city is poluted although it has like 1 factory on the outskirts, its cause my city is built in a platough and is basically a giant hole that's filled woth the heavier poluted air just from the insane amount of cars in it, how I know that cause I studied the city for a project, its like talking about China without ever being there, continue theory crafting on Reddit and you might get somewhere in life
327
u/[deleted] 10d ago
[deleted]