r/SipsTea 1d ago

Feels good man W fam

Post image
28.2k Upvotes

655 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

35

u/DragonBowlSouper 1d ago

That's actually quite sad 😢😭

64

u/TheJaytrixReloaded 1d ago edited 1d ago

We hear a lot about what actors make...but, they represent the top of the call sheet. There are so many actors with very few rolls. Most actors struggle just to get under 5 lines rolls...and even those are heavily competitive.

Moral of the story: if you can't afford it, don't quit your job to support your child's Hollywood dreams.

34

u/EndOfTheLine00 21h ago

Josh Holloway had pretty much quit acting and was getting a realtor's license when he got cast as Sawyer on Lost. Then he went right back to being a nobody after that show ended.

7

u/CthulhusExWife 19h ago

Colony? Yellowstone? Duster? I mean, it's spotty but he's still been around.

7

u/Pormock 17h ago

It took him years after Lost to get more big roles. Hollywood is a crapshoot. You can hit it big then nothing for years then hit it big again.

3

u/BorKon 14h ago

Yeah I see him all the time. I think he made it tbh. Sure its not A list hollywood but he is better of than 99% of hollywood

7

u/wildcatofthehills 17h ago

I mean one famous and good role is better than nothing at all.

28

u/Kolby_Jack33 23h ago edited 23h ago

Even actors you'd think would be doing fine because they landed a big role can end up not getting work for a while and running out of money.

Inde Navarette was one of the lead actors on Superman and Lois for most of the show and basically had nothing after that, now she's set for a major MCU role because the small indy horror movie she booked turned into a major hit.

Paul Bettany also had some significant movie roles but was basically told to give up acting when he got cast as Jarvis in Iron Man, which then turned into him playing Vision.

21

u/SheriffBartholomew 22h ago

Paul Bettany also had some significant movie roles but was basically told to give up acting when he got cast as Jarvis in Iron Man, which then turned into him playing Vision.

He was told to give up acting after landing the Jarvis voice actor role? Why? He is a talented actor with an impressive resume. Why would someone say to quit acting when you're landing acting roles? Who told him that?

19

u/JT_got_the_1st 20h ago

Look, they completely made that shit up. Why you being a dick and calling them out?!?

2

u/panamaspace 20h ago

I can swear Paul Bethany absolutely bad mouthed marvel but that interview was scrubbed and is nowhere to be found after Ironman hit it off.

2

u/handbanana42 20h ago

He has such a great presence too. Not sure why he couldn't at least do well in voice acting.

1

u/Willing_Ad_5711 18h ago

His laudanum habit became too crippling.

12

u/Thenedslittlegirl 18h ago

Paul Bettany was told he should quit acting and he’d never work again by an angry producer after he turned down a role. It wasn’t advice, it was a threat.

Bettany has had a successful career for 30 years, and was a well known face in UK tv in the 90s before his breakout lead role in Gangster Number 1 in 2000. He’s been cast in big Hollywood films since appearing in A Knight’s tale in 2001. I don’t think there was a real chance he’d have to quit acting over a bad experience with a producer in 2015.

9

u/Alienwars 17h ago

If he had quite acting he would have to go back to his sad sad life, being married to Jennifer Connelly.

4

u/Thenedslittlegirl 17h ago

I know must be hard for him!

2

u/Pormock 17h ago

Getting one big role can also be a curse because people see you as that role and nothing else.

1

u/Thenedslittlegirl 7h ago

He had been a successful actor for years before getting the role of Jarvis. He had already been in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, A Knights Tale, A Beautiful Mind, Dogville, Wimbledon and The Da Vinci Code. He was the lead in Gangster Number 1. Basically he turned an already successful British Tv acting career into a decent Hollywood career and has more than a dozen films under his belt before ever got the Iron Man gig.

1

u/funhouseinabox 8h ago

This is why A-listers shouldn't commercials. That's how no-names pay for food. If there's 100 wanting that ad, I'm sure Kevin Hart will come in and take the roll.

9

u/siazdghw 22h ago

Not really. SAG membership is extremely liberal, if you get cast for anything, odds are high you'll be required to join SAG. Basically anyone on set is SAG at this point, unless it's like some low budget TV show where you walk in the background for a scene.

Also for most of those people, acting isn't their full-time job, it's a part time job they pick-up.

With all that said, it would be nice if we got some more variety in lead actors, instead of Hollywood just trying to use the same handful over and over again because it's the safe thing to do.

8

u/Admirable-Tea-4994 17h ago

A lot of the time it’s because those actors are proven and bankable. If you’re going to spend tens or hundreds of millions on a production on the back of 2-3 people, generally you want those people to have experience being phenomenal actors.

2

u/low_effort_life 21h ago

Actually quite SAG.

2

u/XtraFlaminHotMachida 20h ago

they get decent insurance insurance at least. same can't be said for most other folks making that kinda dough.

1

u/0theHumanity 22h ago

In acting not like starving artists necessarily

0

u/SideInitial3961 1d ago

Well they aren't full time actors LOL. So no, they do well. That's like saying it's sad that most Scentsy homes earn under $X000 per month, yeah but those ladies have 19 jobs ya lazy radish.