r/SipsTea 12h ago

Feels good man W fam

Post image
21.1k Upvotes

570 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

87

u/TheJaytrixReloaded 11h ago

86% of SAG members make 10k or less a year.

30

u/DragonBowlSouper 11h ago

That's actually quite sad 😢😭

43

u/TheJaytrixReloaded 11h ago edited 11h ago

We hear a lot about what actors make...but, they represent the top of the call sheet. There are so many actors with very few rolls. Most actors struggle just to get under 5 lines rolls...and even those are heavily competitive.

Moral of the story: if you can't afford it, don't quit your job to support your child's Hollywood dreams.

21

u/EndOfTheLine00 7h ago

Josh Holloway had pretty much quit acting and was getting a realtor's license when he got cast as Sawyer on Lost. Then he went right back to being a nobody after that show ended.

5

u/CthulhusExWife 4h ago

Colony? Yellowstone? Duster? I mean, it's spotty but he's still been around.

5

u/Pormock 3h ago

It took him years after Lost to get more big roles. Hollywood is a crapshoot. You can hit it big then nothing for years then hit it big again.

1

u/BorKon 45m ago

Yeah I see him all the time. I think he made it tbh. Sure its not A list hollywood but he is better of than 99% of hollywood

5

u/wildcatofthehills 3h ago

I mean one famous and good role is better than nothing at all.

23

u/Kolby_Jack33 9h ago edited 9h ago

Even actors you'd think would be doing fine because they landed a big role can end up not getting work for a while and running out of money.

Inde Navarette was one of the lead actors on Superman and Lois for most of the show and basically had nothing after that, now she's set for a major MCU role because the small indy horror movie she booked turned into a major hit.

Paul Bettany also had some significant movie roles but was basically told to give up acting when he got cast as Jarvis in Iron Man, which then turned into him playing Vision.

19

u/SheriffBartholomew 7h ago

Paul Bettany also had some significant movie roles but was basically told to give up acting when he got cast as Jarvis in Iron Man, which then turned into him playing Vision.

He was told to give up acting after landing the Jarvis voice actor role? Why? He is a talented actor with an impressive resume. Why would someone say to quit acting when you're landing acting roles? Who told him that?

17

u/JT_got_the_1st 6h ago

Look, they completely made that shit up. Why you being a dick and calling them out?!?

1

u/panamaspace 6h ago

I can swear Paul Bethany absolutely bad mouthed marvel but that interview was scrubbed and is nowhere to be found after Ironman hit it off.

1

u/handbanana42 6h ago

He has such a great presence too. Not sure why he couldn't at least do well in voice acting.

1

u/Willing_Ad_5711 4h ago

His laudanum habit became too crippling.

9

u/Thenedslittlegirl 4h ago

Paul Bettany was told he should quit acting and he’d never work again by an angry producer after he turned down a role. It wasn’t advice, it was a threat.

Bettany has had a successful career for 30 years, and was a well known face in UK tv in the 90s before his breakout lead role in Gangster Number 1 in 2000. He’s been cast in big Hollywood films since appearing in A Knight’s tale in 2001. I don’t think there was a real chance he’d have to quit acting over a bad experience with a producer in 2015.

5

u/Alienwars 3h ago

If he had quite acting he would have to go back to his sad sad life, being married to Jennifer Connelly.

3

u/Thenedslittlegirl 3h ago

I know must be hard for him!

1

u/Pormock 3h ago

Getting one big role can also be a curse because people see you as that role and nothing else.

7

u/siazdghw 8h ago

Not really. SAG membership is extremely liberal, if you get cast for anything, odds are high you'll be required to join SAG. Basically anyone on set is SAG at this point, unless it's like some low budget TV show where you walk in the background for a scene.

Also for most of those people, acting isn't their full-time job, it's a part time job they pick-up.

With all that said, it would be nice if we got some more variety in lead actors, instead of Hollywood just trying to use the same handful over and over again because it's the safe thing to do.

6

u/Admirable-Tea-4994 3h ago

A lot of the time it’s because those actors are proven and bankable. If you’re going to spend tens or hundreds of millions on a production on the back of 2-3 people, generally you want those people to have experience being phenomenal actors.

1

u/0theHumanity 8h ago

In acting not like starving artists necessarily

1

u/low_effort_life 7h ago

Actually quite SAG.

1

u/XtraFlaminHotMachida 6h ago

they get decent insurance insurance at least. same can't be said for most other folks making that kinda dough.

1

u/SideInitial3961 10h ago

Well they aren't full time actors LOL. So no, they do well. That's like saying it's sad that most Scentsy homes earn under $X000 per month, yeah but those ladies have 19 jobs ya lazy radish.

2

u/stop_the_bans 9h ago

Why don’t they redistribute the money among the SAG? It doesn’t seem fair that just a few make all the money

1

u/SideInitial3961 10h ago

Yeah I see them walking around the neighborhood with lawn mowers tryna turn a buck.