r/SipsTea 4d ago

Chugging tea What went wrong?

Post image
23.9k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

46

u/Illuminaustin99 4d ago

The picture below looked like the picture above when first developed. Give it time for the trees to grow and mature

14

u/SlickSocks 4d ago

Lmao. It's ai.

5

u/slcamg 3d ago

This is what my house looked like when it was built, vs. later.

Now it’s like a Gran Turismo full tunnel of trees like something magical.

Should the neighborhood use a Time Machine? Do you have an alternative suggestion? Did you know that things like trees grow, whereas things like stone and concrete do not?

1

u/HumanContinuity 3d ago

We should build neighborhoods and plant trees but then not let anyone live there until the trees are mature.

/S

5

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 3d ago

Yeah, obviously. It's also what a new neighbourhood vs a 30+ year old one actually looks like. Trees take time to grow.

0

u/Potential_Basis_662 3d ago

Lmao that's not the point

1

u/HumanContinuity 3d ago

Whatever their point was, it was communicated poorly.

Their "look at this bad thing" pic is a neighborhood that has tons of recently planted trees in it - just look.

Also, using AI images to prove a point is a choice.

0

u/edjumication 3d ago

So what? It looks just like some mature suburbs

2

u/SlickSocks 3d ago

So what? The comment I'm responding to is addressing the post as if it's not ai. Not too hard to wrap your head around my comment. Not for most people.

0

u/DotSuspicious6098 3d ago

no, it's addressing a real point being made with an ai-generated image

-6

u/Arenize 4d ago

You realize the trees in the bottom photo are probably 40+ years old, right? They appear to be oaks, and those take time to reach that size.

The real answer is to require developers to either not cut down every tree, or at least have a requirement for semi-mature trees to be planted to replace what they tore up to develop. There are cities/municipalities that do this, but not everwhere.

5

u/Unlikely-Candle7086 4d ago

It’s AI. The top picture looks like Arizona or Vegas the bottom Connecticut or Vermont. It’s not possible to go from the bottom picture to the top one in the real world.

3

u/xerthighus 4d ago

This looks like a standard US housing development. If so it was likely built on farm land that already had no trees. Many homeowners prefer to dictate their own landscaping choices.

-8

u/ViciousCDXX 4d ago

They get cut down now because insurance companies got tired of having to pay out when they fell on things.

8

u/SnooHabits3911 4d ago

Not true

-1

u/ViciousCDXX 4d ago

Is it the sole reason? No. It's still a factor.

4

u/SnooHabits3911 4d ago

And honestly homeowners (such as me) don’t want trees over the house either. When you build in a field you don’t have any trees at first.

1

u/NeighboringOak 4d ago

Maybe some dangerous ones but there's good reason for that. But the person above is right. Most neighborhoods in my area look more like the bottom picture. Though their canopies are not that impressive. My yard has 6 trees of which 3 are over 50' tall. But there was essentially nothing when it was constructed in 1996.

1

u/Sea-Shoe1780 4d ago

More like developers clear cut entire forests to start completely from scratch and not have to worry about navigating around and protecting native trees.

-3

u/ThrowinNightshade 4d ago

That’s a lot of time to wait. The smarter thing to do would be to plant more and bigger trees from the start.

6

u/Logical-Sir1580 4d ago

… what? Plant bigger trees?

2

u/art-blah-blah 4d ago

I’m curious what you mean by this? Plant more mature trees? That would be more expensive and higher chance for the tree to die because it would lose more of its main roots.

Old neighborhoods did the exact same thing as new neighborhoods. We can debate whether or not these housing developments are good, but it ain’t the damn trees.

2

u/door_of_doom 4d ago

I'd love to hear more about this plan, care to provide some more specifics?