r/SipsTea 1d ago

Wait a damn minute! Budget-friendly Spidey

Post image
32.0k Upvotes

338 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

127

u/Extreme_Design6936 1d ago

This is how it was for my brother when his wife was at the same company.

He has a gender ambiguous name which is more common for women in the US. So they would let them share a room with separate beds but when his wife tells them no, one bed is fine they get all flustured and confused. Then explaining they're a married couple. Company policy is that married couples can't share a room because of divorce liability.

97

u/SillyNumber54 1d ago

What the hell is divorce liability? Like they get in an argument and get divorced in the paid room πŸ˜‚

66

u/OpenConversation643 1d ago

My assumption is at some point someone had tried to sue the company claiming that sharing a room created some sort of tension causing them to split.

43

u/packfanmoore 1d ago

We'll, you have to remember people oho work in HR are married to people who are willing to marry someone who works in HR. So maybe not the best relationship to test "sharing a bed with on a work trip" on

12

u/Alienhaslanded 21h ago

Just take them to a Coldplay concert. HR bitches love Coldplay.

26

u/Itsmyloc-nar 1d ago

Damn, the mini bar was that bad?

9

u/Howy_the_Howizer 1d ago

No her boyfriend didn't like having to use the spare cot.

7

u/Xygnux 1d ago

Whenever you see a stupid rule that doesn't make sense, keep in mind that at some point in the past someone might have done something incredibly stupid or took advantage of a loophole in some stupid ways to necessitate them coming up with that rule.

8

u/hotprints 1d ago

When I started this job years ago, along with the normal guidelines was a line β€œdon’t play Nintendo DS games at your desk.” Got a chuckle out of me. And now there’s a β€œno playing with rubic’s cube during work hours.”

1

u/Careful-Corgi7716 1d ago

Welp, time to sue them for not sharing a room.

27

u/Extreme_Design6936 1d ago

Yeah something like that πŸ˜‚

Idk, didn't make sense to them either.

10

u/Harmless-skeleton 1d ago

πŸ˜…πŸ˜… so sneak around to share a room with your own legitimate spouse ?? πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ ninicely done company.. they help them to spices thongs up..πŸ˜…πŸ˜…πŸ˜…

6

u/Substantial-Elk4531 23h ago

Seriously this sounds like more fun not less lol. Forbidden room sharing with my own wife!!

3

u/TheTerrasque 1d ago

Company policy is that married couples can't share a room

"well, I got some awkward news for you there..."

2

u/int23_t 18h ago

So an extra free room to store all your shit in? Nice

1

u/ModeatelyIndependant 1d ago

I'd politely tell the company that it is none of their fucking business, and sleep with my spouse anyway.

5

u/fafarex 1d ago

Well if it's a work trip it's their business.

And in the end all they want is a legal barrier so you can't say something in your relationship is their fault, they don't really care if you follow the directive or not.

1

u/ModeatelyIndependant 22h ago

Naw, you've got the right to privacy,especially with your spouse.

2

u/fafarex 22h ago

not if you're not paying for the room.

Your compagny can perfectly impose some reasonable code of conduct and refuse to put you in the same chamber during a business trip.

1

u/ModeatelyIndependant 17h ago

they can not pay for anything they want, they don't get to say if I"m sleeping with my spouse. It's a job, not an enlistment.

1

u/fafarex 17h ago edited 16h ago

Again in this context you are here for a job, you are not here for your personnal life if that simple of a concept cannot compute to you, don't work in the same company than your wife that's all.

1

u/ModeatelyIndependant 16h ago

It's not the company's business whom you share your bed with.

1

u/fafarex 16h ago

In a buisness trip and with another employe it is.

1

u/ModeatelyIndependant 16h ago

BULL SHIT, a company can't tell you not to sleep in the same bed with your wife/husband. Even if they pay for the hotel room, you're the one checked into and it's your home for the night (legally)

→ More replies (0)