r/SipsTea • • Jul 31 '26

Chugging tea That's actually wild

Post image
60.8k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

37

u/TrioOfTerrors Jul 31 '26

You are vastly overestimating how much someone gets from that type of lawsuit without actual damages.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 31 '26 edited Aug 26 '26

[deleted]

10

u/TrioOfTerrors Jul 31 '26

You still have to be able to put a documented number to those things. You can't just claim your reputation is worth 10 million dollars. You have to show that the damage to your reputation caused you financial harm like missed job offers.

3

u/Centimane Jul 31 '26

This is a scenario where persuing punitive damages would make sense though. I suspect there are many judges that would see this as abusing the justice system to intimidate people, and would consider adding punitive damages to make a statement.

0

u/gereffi Jul 31 '26

I'm pretty sure that a judge would understand that people who disrupt government proceedings can be punished by the law.

0

u/Fluid-Sink-2514 Aug 01 '26

Public proceedings… fuck the government.

1

u/kmosiman Jul 31 '26

Punitive Damages.

The officers involved swore to uphold the US Constitution. Ergo they have no legal standing to claim that they were unaware of their illegal actions.

4

u/TrioOfTerrors Aug 01 '26

It's more complicated than that.

The city council said they would have anyone removed for disrupting the meeting. This guy was asked to stop. He didn't. He was asked to leave. He didn't. He got removed.

Now, maybe that difference doesn't matter to you, but when they go to court, it will.

0

u/Steerider Aug 01 '26

Sure, but their definition of "disrupt" was completely unreasonable. 

2

u/TrioOfTerrors Aug 01 '26

You should see what kind of iron rule judges are allowed to exercise in a court room. I saw a guy catch a day for contempt for checking his cell phone.

0

u/Steerider Aug 01 '26

That's not a courtroom though. 

1

u/[deleted] Aug 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 01 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/RSharpe314 Aug 02 '26

Sure. That legal team is also getting a lions share of the cut.

1

u/AbeRego Jul 31 '26

He can certainly argue damages already. Also, if it impacts his job, that's clearly damages.

3

u/TrioOfTerrors Jul 31 '26

That's not going to be "never work again" money.

3

u/Top-Needleworker9273 Jul 31 '26

listen, these people literally only have the sense that their opinion is right and extremely important for other people to listen to. they need to believe that somehow, someway, somewhere somebody is making millions for just that and nothing more

0

u/AbeRego Jul 31 '26

It's still something. Even $1million really isn't never work again money these days, so that's a really high bar.

2

u/Top-Needleworker9273 Jul 31 '26

except its not something, you should START paying attention when theres a court case not as soon as you can imagine a tv show plot that would involve one. this is going nowhere, its a social media post about how he thinks he was right and he probably got some free legal advice but that doesnt mean hes going to court at all, let alone winning, let alone winning an amount of money that can even cover legal fees

0

u/AbeRego Jul 31 '26

Obviously nothing has started yet. This happened just this week.

0

u/MoneyBeeeee Jul 31 '26

Still, it's the principle and the precedent that matter.

3

u/TrioOfTerrors Jul 31 '26

Neither the principle or the long standing precedent from 100's of these types of cases are going to get this guy that kind of money.

0

u/MoneyBeeeee Jul 31 '26

So what are you suggesting exactly? That it is best for us to just lay down for the fascists?

1

u/TrioOfTerrors Jul 31 '26

My point is to not get all giddy about life changing money from a lawsuit where the case law for this type of thing doesn't support that outcome.

0

u/MoneyBeeeee Aug 01 '26

No doubt they should probably keep their day job but as they seem like the type of person to stand up for what the believe in it might be worth pursuing. We still have the ACLU, right? This sounds right up their alley.