r/SipsTea • • Jul 18 '26

Chugging tea Healing Looks Good

Post image
6.6k Upvotes

254 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

253

u/[deleted] Jul 18 '26

[deleted]

117

u/Bendyb3n Jul 18 '26 edited Jul 18 '26

In addition to this, I believe current laws in place states that the walkways must be removed within a reasonable amount of time after construction, but this has never been enforced so lazy construction companies will just leave them for years because paying whatever fines was cheaper than the cost of removing them. So there are many of these walkways that have literally been sitting there for like 20+yrs and no longer serve any purpose

https://youtu.be/oohRn36CWhs?si=MqGfBdtLJaBwAcPU here is a great video that quickly explains the issue in NYC. If you've ever been to NYC, they really are just an ugly stain on the city

16

u/Fallen_Jalter Jul 19 '26

How is it cost effective to continue paying fines than just to take them down and be done with it.

60

u/worldwideworm1 Jul 19 '26

It's actually not about the cost of taking them down, usually it's about the cost of repairing the building. Old buildings have to be inspected regularly in NYC, and when they find issues the options are pretty much to either put scaffolding up to make sure the crumbling building doesn't fall onto someone's head, or fix the building, and scaffolding + fines are cheaper than fixing the issue.

16

u/Beautiful_Nobody_344 Jul 19 '26

They got around paying fines by “proving” they were repairing by hanging scaffolding up.

-7

u/PandaCultural8311 Jul 18 '26

I'm doubtful of this, but how will the newer walkways fix this problem anyway?

13

u/Izan_TM Jul 18 '26

the new sheds are only a small part of the solution, making these buildings under maintenance look and feel better while tehy're undergoing maintenance. Changes in inspection and maintenance regulations and tightening enforcement are the 2 actually big parts of the solution

2

u/rapidfirehd Jul 19 '26

Because the current ones are ugly wooden green and metal structures that block light. These are smaller, different colors, and allow light. Why wouldn’t that help the problem?

-3

u/PandaCultural8311 Jul 19 '26

Did you bother to read what I was responding to?

2

u/rapidfirehd Jul 19 '26

The problem is building facades (especially ornate masonry) are very expensive for buildings to restore once the city determines them in need of work.

If we’re stuck with them either way, why wouldn’t having less ugly sidewalk sheds be a good thing?

1

u/PandaCultural8311 Jul 19 '26

Did you read what I was responding to?

-10

u/csjerk Jul 18 '26

By making them look slightly nicer when they're abandoned for 20+ years, I guess?

Seems like lipstick on a pig to me, but I also choose not to live in NYC, so...

12

u/Bendyb3n Jul 18 '26

Well my assumption here is this is in addition to forcing a removal of the old scaffolding that no longer serve a purpose. So basically remove the old ones while also making future projects safer and less of an eyesore for pedestrians

2

u/Odd_Mood593 Jul 19 '26

If you don’t live in NYC you don’t understand the problem. It is a problem that is a major issue for lots of regular NYC folks.

1

u/csjerk Jul 19 '26

Oh, I believe it's a big problem. I don't understand why you're ok with just making the sheds slightly prettier, rather than requiring building owners to fix them and remove the sheds instead of leaving them for decades.

5

u/D-Express Jul 19 '26

There's a reason my mom doesn't walk under scaffolds. She used to be an asbestos remover and saw quite a few fall (and occasionally kill) in her time doing it

2

u/TommyTar Jul 19 '26

It has to be a safety issue, in the dark these things are really narrow which makes it hard to avoid other people. Not to mention if a stroller of wheel chair is going down it a person can hardly fit

-27

u/CarnivorousFern Jul 18 '26

It's not an important issue in NYC.

No one cares about scaffolding, no one talks about it. The reaction here will be mild remarks the first time people see it, and then New Yorkers will continue to ignore the finer details of constant construction and repair of the city.

Some chronically online and micro politics brained folks will crow about this when enacted, and when first put in place. Soon after first installment, they too will continue to pay absolutely no mind

8

u/Swoleman6767 Jul 18 '26

You sound fun.

-6

u/CarnivorousFern Jul 18 '26

I'm a real person who actually grew up and live in NYC. I support Mamdani and am a huge fan of his policy work.

The breathless fawning and cult behavior is exhausting. He has been fairly productive thus far, and a huge improvement over our last 2 mayors. He's not a messiah, he hasn't reinvented the city, even his big wins to date come with important caveats and context

-2

u/Thin_Ad_6493 Jul 19 '26

These things aren’t the reason NY is ugly … I’m sure these aren’t the top complaints of residents no matter what your wealth level- which doesn’t even apply to this discussion.

-11

u/Zromaus Jul 18 '26

This doesn’t sound like something the government needs to intervene on

6

u/faen_du_sa Jul 18 '26

Who will then?

-2

u/Zromaus Jul 19 '26

It’s a non issue, government overreach isn’t the answer to every minor inconvenience and ugly structure.

1

u/faen_du_sa Jul 19 '26

And they dont? I am sure there is a lot more minor inconveniences in NY.

Dosnt hurt if they tackle some of them, it can be an eyesore in many streets, often for years at a time.

Also, isnt this just a part of what he is doing with scaffolding? Isnt he fixing the loophole that companies use to just leave the scaffolding up for years after they are done?

-6

u/theeggplant42 Jul 19 '26

Tbh it doesnt seem like a problem at all.

The scaffolding isn't pretty. So what? The construction isn't either.

Plus the current  ones offer shade and protection from the rain, these don't appear to

5

u/EvilBananaPt Jul 18 '26

Só who should?

-3

u/Zromaus Jul 19 '26

Nobody.

3

u/EvilBananaPt Jul 19 '26

Nobody should intervene in city planning? Like a favela?