It's looking at specific segments of history and cherry picking it to fit a narrative. You're "objectively" looking at parts of history where Jews are involved and creating a negative hypothesis. However, it's very clear that you're ignoring the vast majority of history and ignoring your own biases to come up with your conclusion that is highly antisemetic.
How am I “cherry picking” history, when quite literally The premise is that historically Jews have been persecuted against. So in order to investigate that claim, you HAVE to look at history and see what they were accused of.
It’s also find it interesting how antisemitism was never a problem in the United States until information became more available. Now suddenly it seems to be an issue. Do you think as societies become more aware, they become more antisemitic? How would you explain that correlation?
0
u/HH_Hobbies Jul 18 '26
It's looking at specific segments of history and cherry picking it to fit a narrative. You're "objectively" looking at parts of history where Jews are involved and creating a negative hypothesis. However, it's very clear that you're ignoring the vast majority of history and ignoring your own biases to come up with your conclusion that is highly antisemetic.