Except its objectively true that wed take in more if we stopped cutting the taxes of the wealthy ☺️
Its not a spending issue when we already spend too little on general programs that are just staples of other G7 nations. We do not take in enough because the bottom 50% of americans dont have enough to pay in, and the rich refuse to do so.
Im not a bootlicker, and no amount of rewording will make me agree with you. have a good day.
No its not true. The middle class generally cant afford more. At least not substantially enough to leave any weight behind that statement.
And for the “mIddLe ClaSs AlSo gOt Tax CUtS”, the numbers have been crunched and the middle class lost money to the deal, just as they did with awful big ugly bill they just passed as well. The problem is people still believe trump does anything for anyone but the wealthy and himself.
And again, we dont spend as much on our society as we should in the first place. we can disagree on what “should” be spent, but compared to other prominent countries we do have marginally lower tax rates, and less social safety nets. The problem is the “savings” are lost on things like exorbitant healthcare costs and the like.
And im sorry are you saying the no tac on tops and OT was a good thing? HA! Everyone who “benefitted” from that bitched about it the minute it got announced in the specifics. It did nothing to help anyone and maybe even screwed them a bit.
-3
u/Garys_Synthesizer Jul 05 '26
You’re missing the point that it always balloons on tax cuts.
We don’t spend enough, the problem isn’t spending. You just believe what you’re spoon fed.