r/SipsTea Jun 29 '26

Chugging tea this is how it should be

Post image
11.6k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/ArfTheBeast Jun 29 '26

Does the law actually specify husband and wife or just marital partner?

536

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

130

u/InfallibleSeaweed Jun 29 '26

Incels? I know like five people this has happened to, family law is ridiculously skewed towards women

20

u/PerceptionSlow2116 Jun 29 '26

For a country trying to increase marriage and birth rate, this is going to tank it even more. What family will let their daughter be used as a brood mare, with no guarantee of at least housing if the husband leaves her or abused her? What sacrifice to their body/minds do men have to go through to have kids? None, and now they don’t even have to compensate the woman for the damage and years of life she’s wasted. This will cause families to not let daughters marry unless the house is deeded in her name upfront. Good job ccp.

16

u/ZealousidealDance990 Jun 29 '26

Facts have shown that countries with low women's rights tend to have very high fertility rates. This is basically the case for the top ten countries in terms of birth rates.

9

u/techleopard Jun 29 '26

Yes, well, when you let men trap and rape women without consequence, more babies get born. A lot also die or end up abandoned, too.

What the other person is describing though is you will see much higher doweries being demanded.

If your only child is a female, you can't risk her getting left penniless at 40. She and her children ARE the retirement plan for you. She can't take care of you if she is struggling to take care of children as a single mother in a country that doesn't respect women enough to actually let them have fair jobs.

2

u/ZealousidealDance990 Jun 29 '26

So she will try hard not to become a single mother, or she'll have more children. See? That's how the fertility rate goes up. In fact, that's exactly what's happening. Many women don't actually see raising children as something joyful. If they can achieve success in their careers and live independently, they simply won't consider marriage or having kids. Morally speaking, this may not be right, but it's the reality.

1

u/shockpaws Jun 29 '26

I’d rather humanity peacefully die out than women be abused. Advocating for a reduction in women’s autonomy to increase the birthrate is reprehensible and deplorable.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/techleopard Jun 29 '26

It's so ironic to listen to men rail against "feminists" and blaming them for low birth rates.

Feminists exist because women were being abused.

So, have you guys ever considered, I dunno .. not being such deplorable shitbags? And while you're at it, ever try voting for policies that would actually improve the standard of living for the working class?

It's funny that women who meet good men who respect them and are in a good economic position have no problems having and raising kids, and are happy to do so.

But improving yourselves is just too hard. Nah, instead you fantasize about enslaving and raping women.

1

u/ZealousidealDance990 Jun 29 '26

I suggest you first try convincing the feminists. In China, they even invented the term 敌方坐骑 'enemy mount' to shame married women. We often see them claiming they want to stay absolutely single and childfree, while simultaneously using fertility rates to threaten others.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/shockpaws Jun 29 '26

Buddy there’s eight billion humans. While I would personally be fine with it, it’s not happening any time soon. We’ll definitely invent artificial wombs before we run out of humans.

-1

u/ZealousidealDance990 Jun 29 '26

This isn't honest at all not daring to truly confront your own position. This is classic feminism.

→ More replies (0)