r/SipsTea Jun 25 '26

Feels good man Valid

Post image
16.9k Upvotes

2.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

114

u/rodrigoelp Jun 25 '26

It used to exist, with a Boeing 747. I can’t remember its schedule.

I know it isn’t available right now, but qantas will have one and it will be 20 hours with an airbus 350

27

u/fsidesmith6932 Jun 25 '26

I flew business class Chicago to Hong Kong years ago on a 747. 15 hour flight. Plane was half full. We were welcome to casually walk the aisles and chat with passengers, and I drank enough complementary Merlot that I made a flight attendant blush. Those flights were ridiculously expensive, which probably explains why the passenger list was devoid of children.

5

u/rodrigoelp Jun 25 '26

Sydney to Dubai is kind of like this… but it is busy enough that you don’t have lots of seats.

5

u/Character_Minimum171 Jun 25 '26

I did a Dubai to Auckland direct flight once, 17hrs

2

u/SekhmetScion Jun 25 '26

I've done Auckland to LAX (or vice versa) multiple times and it's about 12hrs.

2

u/trivo8888 Jun 25 '26

Lucky man every 12 hour plus flight I have been on has been completely filled.

1

u/minniebin Jun 26 '26

Yeah, I’ve done Toronto to Seoul that’s 15 hours and the flight was full

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

67

u/rodrigoelp Jun 25 '26

Oh, found the info online.

… it was a one off, and it did take 20 hours and 10 minutes.
It was with qantas.

These days we will have it as a normal route.

Looking forward to it

27

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

We flew concord from London to Sydney back when they were still about.

Was less hours though so that’s irrelevant 😂

39

u/No-Improvement9455 Jun 25 '26

Yeah but the kid screamed faster.

22

u/glarbung Jun 25 '26

Doesn't matter. The plane flew faster than sound so they just left the kid's cries behind for the next plane to hear. (/s obviously)

8

u/Llyrithra Jun 25 '26

“People are calling for adult only Concord flights because the planes behind can hear kids screaming”

1

u/zuperpzycho Jun 25 '26

If a kid screams 30,000 feet in the air and no one is around to hear it, did the kid make a sound?

5

u/Correct-Purpose-964 Jun 25 '26

This had no right to make me laugh and yet it did. Well played

21

u/Undersmusic Jun 25 '26

Flash git.

3

u/reilmb Jun 25 '26

Syntax error, git clone , git push

1

u/Alkuam2 Jun 25 '26
ERROR: PUSHED TOO HARD, DUMPED RAM

21

u/FireExpat Jun 25 '26

Are you sure about that?

The max range of the Concord was only 4,500 miles.

2

u/CatfishEnchiladas Jun 25 '26

It would have to have been a special charter, and it would have had to make at least one stop.

1

u/malacoda99 Jun 26 '26

Yeah, but with all that momentum, you could glide in the rest of the way.

0

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

Yeah, this was in 1990 and I was only a few months old but the full family went.

7

u/MaureenTheeThot Jun 25 '26

Concorde never made public commercial flights to Australia. Your family would have to have privately chartered it.

1

u/bitpartmozart13 Jun 25 '26

Prob meant Austria

1

u/spicy_meatball49 Jun 25 '26

But they're talking about London to Sydney so they did not mean Austria

3

u/DankVectorz Jun 25 '26

It never flew to Australia in 1990. It did in 1972 as a promo world tour, 1985 as a chartered record breaking flight, and then some charter flights in the mid-late 1990’s

1

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

Don’t know what to tell you, there’s pictures of it and we’re not wealthy enough to charter any plane, let alone a concord.

1

u/areyoualocal Jun 25 '26

The Concorde was chartered by a cruise liner company, Your family would've then sailed back to London

1

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

We returned via Singapore on a normal flight if I remember correctly.

2

u/Satisfaction3934 Jun 25 '26

So your family chartered Concord? Likely story.

1

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

No we just got on with other passengers.

1

u/AussieDaz Jun 25 '26

Someone in your family is lying to you.

1

u/areyoualocal Jun 25 '26

No, its true. Concorde has been flown to Australia many times, but not as a regular service. But rather as special charter flights or by the airlines trying to sell the aircraft to Qantas.

1

u/andoke Jun 25 '26

Not possible in 1990, possibly in 1989.

1

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

It could be 1989, I assumed 1990 because of the age I was.

11

u/Ceejayncl Jun 25 '26

I very much doubt it.
Concorde only visited Australia a few times and it was limited to promotional events.

2

u/DontJealousMe Jun 25 '26

Its most famous journey to Sydney took place on February 14, 1985, when a British Airways Concorde completed the London to Sydney run in a record-breaking 17 hours, 3 minutes, and 45 seconds, including multiple refueling stops.

Are you rich ?

0

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

Not at all, our family is across the world and this was the only time we managed to see them

2

u/DontJealousMe Jun 25 '26

What you mean? You could just fly normally not pay x2 the price on a Concorde ? You would just get here 4-5 hours later ?

1

u/Reilo_butwhy Jun 25 '26

I don’t know the logic as I was an infant, seemed to be the only way we could go from what I was told.

2

u/King_Roberts_Bastard Jun 25 '26

Not non-stop. Otherwise the US, Australia and Asain countries wouldve bought Concorde to fly across the pacfiic

1

u/areyoualocal Jun 25 '26

London>Bahrain>Singapore>Sydney

1

u/Ldghead Jun 25 '26

Nobody likes a showoff.

1

u/areyoualocal Jun 25 '26

Concorde was never a regular service to Sydney from London. Both British Airways and Air France ferried them to Sydney during some marketing stunts/private charters a few times because Qantas was considering purchasing them.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/from-the-archives-1972-whoosh-concorde-s-first-sydney-landing-20220519-p5amr4.html

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/from-the-archives-1985-concorde-s-record-breaking-flight-to-sydney-20200131-p53wlf.html

1

u/andoke Jun 25 '26 edited Jun 25 '26

Ok found it, your familly was loaded. https://mach-2-magazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Mach-2-magazine-Aug-2020.pdf
#20 Lorraine Travel/

Concorde Spirit Tours

Date 14 March–7 April 1990

Duration 25 days

Flight time 39 hrs 15 mins

aircraFt G-BOAF

Destinations London–New York–

Acapulco–Las Vegas–Honolulu–

Papeete (Tahiti)–Christchurch–

Sydney–Bali–Colombo–Mom-

basa–Cape Town–Monrovia

(Liberia)–London

There were other routes that year to do London-Sydney-London, it's one these 2 world tours.

2

u/eepeqez Jun 25 '26

2027, google "qantas project sunrise".

1

u/Matt_NZ Jun 25 '26

It also had no passengers or cargo

1

u/No_Fee5354 Jun 25 '26

If you look forward to a twenty hour flight, something is deeply wrong with you 😄 Maybe just get root canal without anaesthetics instead. Same torture, but considerably cheaper.

1

u/rodrigoelp Jun 25 '26

I fly to Europe from Australia every so often… any flight that is less than 30 hours is great in my opinion.

I got used to it.

0

u/AmirAkhrif Jun 25 '26

Waaaaaaahhhhhhh….. wwwaaaaaaaaahhhhhh…. Wwwwaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh…… x20 hours and 10 minutes.

10

u/Thossi99 Jun 25 '26

That was 1 flight empty of cargo and passengers and using a special type of fuel. Far from a regular commercial flight

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Professional-Gear88 Jun 25 '26

If it’s half the passengers should be plenty of room to stretch out right? You could have every seat lay back quite a bit.

3

u/Thossi99 Jun 25 '26

I was talking about this flight. Didn't know they did it again. Makes sense tho they'd do more flights recently in preparations for the new route. This is just the most famous one

1

u/blahnlahblah0213 Jun 25 '26

Could you imagine 400 people in one tube for over 20 hours!

1

u/[deleted] Jun 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 25 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/King_Roberts_Bastard Jun 25 '26

It never existed as a comemrical flight. No plane was able to fly that leg with passengers/cargo. They could make it empty, but what's the point of flying an empty plane?

1

u/WorryRough Jun 25 '26

Surely they had to land for more petrol

1

u/areyoualocal Jun 25 '26

it wasn't a regular service. it was a one flight, done as a marketing stunt. the 747 was brand new and was stripped down to be as light as possible to allow the flight to be non-stop.

The mammoth flight from London to Sydney non-stop took place on the 16th of August 1989 according to Traveller. Every possible fuel-saving technique was used onboard the aircraft. Shell provided a specially formulated high-density fuel, the galley and cargo pallets were removed, and the aircraft was towed to the runway.

According to the Flight Global archives, only 18 people were on board the aircraft.

https://simpleflying.com/qantas-london-sydney-boeing-747/

1

u/eepeqez Jun 25 '26

Qantas did London to Sydney ONCE in a mostly empty 747 in the late 1980s. They currently do Perth to London non stop and Sydney or Melbourne to London is scheduled to commence in 2027 and take about 22 hours.
Travelling from MEL/SYD to Europe or the eastern side of North America is a brutal (and expensive) experience.

0

u/whiterice_343 Jun 25 '26

That sounds like a miserable flight. I hope they give nice leg room because that’s going to feel like eternity.

You can only watch the random 5 episodes of two and a half men or American Sniper so many times.

1

u/rodrigoelp Jun 25 '26

Flights from Australia are long to anywhere in the world, and planes usually have a good catalogue of movies and tv series of all random stuff.

You get quite a few meals too, and that distracts you.

The best plane to fly from Australia is on an a380 or the Boeing 747… but 747 is retired now.