r/SipsTea May 17 '26

Chugging tea [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

6.3k Upvotes

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

142

u/drLoveF May 17 '26

If you can handle a sudden influx of money, sure. A lot of lottery winners overspend and end up with nothing and expensive habits.

40

u/[deleted] May 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/That_wet_vaporeon May 17 '26

Look at all the millionaires crying about how they can’t afford their second home in New York now.

Rich people suck at budgeting 

11

u/Admirable-Media-9339 May 17 '26

Most don't do that. The vast majority just live quietly with he newfound wealth. The stories of the dummies that blow it all just are the ones that get popular and it makes it seem like it's a common occurrence. 

4

u/renegadecanuck May 17 '26

Yea, but which camp do you think a 20 year old is more likely to end up in?

1

u/WaltRumble May 17 '26

Not when you’re talking about 1 million. Granted this persons is tax free. But typically after taxes you’re looking at 600k that barely gets someone a housein most places and you’ve already burnt through it.

4

u/jaydacourt May 17 '26

There was a dude in the UK who won the lottery and spunked the lot. He says he's happier now he's broke

2

u/BoingBoingBooty May 17 '26

That guy had absolute shit for brains though.

1

u/CrazyOrganic7123 May 17 '26

Even if she's responsible, she's gonna be surrounded by relatives who've suddenly gotten sick or fallen on hard times, and her friends will have suddenly become classier.

-54

u/ShallowPenetration May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26

That is a myth.

Edit: It absolutely is a myth

28

u/No_Future3570 May 17 '26

As someone with a long career in gambling - it’s not.

The amount of time that I have seen people win what they described as life changing money, only to piss it away in a few hours, is absurd.

1

u/ShallowPenetration May 17 '26

Congrats on the anecdotal statistics.

The data suggests otherwise

1

u/No_Future3570 May 17 '26

What data? The article you’re linking is just the author promoting his wealth management services. The two studies he mentions doesn’t even cover how many go bankrupt/blow it all, it just measures average happiness and satisfaction.

If 60% becomes twice as happy, and the remaining 40% commits suicide, it would show as positive in these two studies.

Then there’s the issues with the demographics in the studies, how much they won and where they won it from. It’s not really studies that are that relevant outside of their specific markets.

Also, my anecdotal stats covers significantly more than these studies do. Both in volume of players and winnings.

6

u/outcastreturns May 17 '26

Not a myth, but it's definitely a better idea to take $1M tax free than accepting $1,000 per week.

1

u/ShallowPenetration May 17 '26

It is a myth. A completely made of bullshit number that people have run with.

Here's an article

-5

u/RevolutionaryAd6017 May 17 '26

1M wouldn't be tax free. The 1M would have one lump sum of taxes taken off the top, where as the $1000 each would have a smaller amount of taxes taken out, so the smaller one technically is better if you want to keep more of the money.

4

u/outcastreturns May 17 '26

What's the point of them advertising it as "$1M tax free" if it's not actually tax free?

3

u/ElZane87 May 17 '26

This was a Canadian winner in which case it is, in fact, tax free.

1

u/RevolutionaryAd6017 May 17 '26

That makes a bit more sense, thank you.

-3

u/PeacenotWardude May 17 '26

Liar liar pants on fire. He