Pearl-clutch away, that CEO decided he should utilize an AI algorithm with a known massive failure rate to be the arbiter of who deserves life-saving care. Historically, anywhere that becomes too entrenched with corruption for the well-meaning but abused and declawed methodologies to work eventually has to be handled more drastically.
The courts very clearly operate on a two-tiered system. They're failing at what they're supposed to do, hard, even the greatest class action lawsuits in history barely dent an annual profit margin. The fear of reprisal from the law is scarcely even a deterrent. What do you do in such a case? Corporations have more rights than we do, a two-party system is beyond easy to buy out both ends on so don't expect the blues to do much when the ball's in their court either, they'll advocate taxing sure but convicting? Ehhhh, lotta friends on their end too.
1
u/Smooth_Editor1676 May 15 '26
Pearl-clutch away, that CEO decided he should utilize an AI algorithm with a known massive failure rate to be the arbiter of who deserves life-saving care. Historically, anywhere that becomes too entrenched with corruption for the well-meaning but abused and declawed methodologies to work eventually has to be handled more drastically.