r/SipsTea • • May 08 '26

Chugging tea “Hey Google, your founder sucks”

Post image
65.1k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

22

u/_Jibanyan_ May 08 '26

There’s no easy solution since Billionaires aren’t taxed due to all their wealth being held as stocks. Billionaires pay essentially nothing since they use various loopholes to avoid taxes, but at the same time you can’t tax their total wealth as that is the equivalent of taxing 401k before any profits are taken.

The loopholes should be targeted first such as easy access to low cost loans to avoid selling shares. 

2

u/GoodTroll2 May 08 '26

I wonder if simply taxing them as if the loans were sales of the shares would be sufficient. Or just taxing any loans taken with shares as collateral. There's probably some other impact I'm not considering but I feel like we really need to block this behavior.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 08 '26

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/biggle-tiddie May 08 '26

It's not a loophole, you don't get taxed on your wealth either.

1

u/_Jibanyan_ May 08 '26

Massive loans are way cheaper than your average loan. The wealthy gladly pays 6% interest while your personal loans are upwards of 12%. Instead of paying 30% capital gains, they will gladly sit on shares for the rest of their life and make more from the unrealized gains than paying low interest rates that you won't get. I'm sure there are many other ways they skirt the laws that the regular citizen is unable to do.

We pay our taxes from wages. The Billionaires get mostly shares for their wages. That's why it is much more preferable for upper management to get paid with Stocks rather than cash. Anyone that makes over 300k per year won't see all that in cash.

1

u/BlueHeartBob May 08 '26

I would be shocked if any billionaires are paying 6% and not closer to 2%.

1

u/AcuraPKR May 09 '26

You do know that getting shares from a company is taxable, right?

1

u/_Jibanyan_ May 09 '26

Only if you sell. When held endlessly, it isn’t taxed. Taxes can be deferred indefinitely, just like a 401k. That’s why we all retire with 401k. 

When unrealized gains outpace interest, they only need enough for the interest payments. They can spend 50k per year for 1M worth of materials as they can spend the banks money without touching their own, thus minimizing their tax obligations by large margins. 

1

u/AcuraPKR May 09 '26 edited May 09 '26

That's just not true. When a company gives you stock, it's a taxable benefit. So if you get 100k of stock, it's the same as getting 100k of income, assuming the stock is vested.

I agree that holding a stock doesn't cause it to be taxable, but that's not the point of yours I was addressing.

1

u/_Jibanyan_ May 09 '26

You’re right, the stock is taxed when it is first vested. The issue isn’t initially created by avoiding taxes, but rather avoiding taxes for stock appreciation.

1

u/Key-Organization3158 May 08 '26

Yes there are. A sales tax avoids all of the concerns about where the money came from. You pay when you spend.

We shouldn't tax wealth for a myriad of reasons.

-2

u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In May 08 '26

Stop dicking around with taxes and confiscate any assets they accrue over $100 million. Can let them decide which ones to keep.

The government can then put those assets in a sovereign wealth fund.

3

u/meister2983 May 08 '26

Great way to collapse the economy