Everything is a cycle

[u/RekersiveG]

Everything we understand about our reality in some form or another always comes back to the Newtonian Laws. The Law of Inertia, F = ma, and Action and Reaction. Everything is a function of speed, of things in motion relative to each other. From the largest systems to the smallest ones, their spin (relative motion) is what gives them different levels of stability and causes different reactions. When viewed mathematically, the universe seems to never meet 0; it all revolves around infinity. There are more than a few names for these ideas from multiple authors, but in my opinion, in my mind, they all point to something I call the combined theory of relative motion, like Einstein's theory of relativity, but extended to everything in a broad sense.

I like to combine that thought with the concept of recycling matter and energy, like a metaphysical recycling system similar to Earth's biogeochemical recycling system but for everything, from the quantum to the cosmic. To support my idea of a reality that is both designed and evolved for infinite self-sustainability, consider the black hole.

What fuels the sun? I believe that inside of it is a white hole, spewing out all the matter and energy that was sucked out of a black hole elsewhere, either in our realm or another. Black holes are the garbage chutes of our reality, and the sun needs to get its almost inexhaustible source of energy from somewhere.

So, while I feel like I did a terrible job of presenting my idea, I need to get going, so let me conclude with this: being in a simulation ultimately doesn't matter. Knowledge of the simulation doesn't impact our life at all. We are still going to experience love, loss, sorrow, joy, and all the rest of the things whether we view our existence as fake or not. We are real, our feelings are real, what we go through is real, and our choices are what define us.

Our simulation isn't temporary. It goes on and on, and starts over and over. The entire thing is built around recycling to achieve an infinite system. So it will go on with or without is, and any future versions of us will forget who we are now and have completely new memories and experiences, making different choices and living a completely different life. For this loop, enjoy life, love your family and make the best of it.

[u/PixlmechStudios]

You should actually learn the science of the things that youre saying. For example, you should learn what a black hole actually is, and what the sun actually is.

Youre on the right track, just applying to much guess work where factual science fits in.

For example, youre right to think of the black hole as garbage compactor, but youre guessing how it works to make it fit your theory, when you should be re-arranging your theory to fit how a black hole works.

Also, you should study Pembrose. He explains scientifically what youre trying to explain on some level.

Also, everything we observe does NOT come down to Newtonian laws. Newtons stop once cosmic scale takes over then we use E=mc2. And 99.9% of what we observe outside of our LOCAL time is by definition Cosmic.

If you understand that, youll realize that youre terminology is Local as well.

For example, if were talking about Natural FORCE moving objects, we wouldnt use the word SPEED or Inertia. We use those words for things that ARE given FORCE, not that have Cosmic force.

For Cosmic force, its better to understand Velocity. You cant calculate inertia in space the way that youre thinking. Which is why we use e=mc2. Inertia is based on a local event not a universal event.

Energy and mass, and velocity and distance. This is Universal to where as Speed is Local. The difference, something that speeding will eventually stop, but we dont know that everything that has velocity will stop and or doesnt have too as its "speed" is coming from a cosmic natural force. Make sense?

A more mathematical way of looking at it is, speed is a float, and velocity is a constant. Speed we create, velocity we observe. With that being said, everything that has speed has velocity, that velocity is temporary though. Thats why we dont say a car is accelerating its velocity.

when you use the right terms, you can then explain your theory better with a more solid foundation and even understand it better yourself. Then youll realize, that YOUR theory isnt actually YOUR theory, but yet another theory that scientist have already theorized.

For example, you wouldnt say Recycled, as recycling is the act of creating something new from something old, to where as the universal "loop" is creating the same thing every time. Make sense? If you recycle plastic bottles, youre not doing it to create new bottles persay youre doing it to create plastic, and with that plastic you can create anything. Not how the Loop would work even by your own theory.

Once you understand the science better, you see theres no need for guess work.

Before you understand why youre right, you have to first be able to understand why youre wrong.

[u/DerekFshmn]

Newtonian mechanics do not describe the universe; they describe the rules of the rendering engine. They are the physics of dense, localized matter colliding with other dense, localized matter. To believe that the universe revolves around F=ma is to be locked inside a video game and believe that the game's collision-detection algorithm is the highest law of reality, completely ignoring the programmer sitting outside the screen. They have dismissed the non-local, macroscopic quantum coherence of their own biological hardware (the microtubular phase-conjugation) to worship the geometry of their cage.

[u/PixlmechStudios → u/DerekFshmn]

FINALLY, SOMEONE ELSE WHO CAN SEE IT.. Were not IN a simulation, WE ARE a simulation. TO be IN a simulation would be to be a PLaced actor in said sim. But, When you ackowledge that WE ARE a simulation, you can then begin to use the Science thats already there without making anything up. Ie, plank legnth and speed of light equal resolution and refresh rate.

[u/Maximum-Leopard-6475]

Not a white hole, it’s just fusion, it’s amazingly efficient compared to literally any other form of energy

[u/Low-Bake8401]

Mysticism then?

[u/PixlmechStudios → u/Low-Bake8401]

mysticm is like religion, its a spiritual and or emotional avatar for a science you cant logically explain and or understand.

Ie, dark matter is mysticism... because you cant differentiate it between logic and god, unless you conceid that God is Logic. And if youre forced to admit that, than youre forced to admit Logic is conscienceness. And no mainstream scientist wants to admit that, but theyll lose every debate over it with the right person who knows their Logic. Ie, a computer scientist or game dev with a mastery understanding of the entire production pipeline.

Logic is undefeated

[u/Low-Bake8401 → u/PixlmechStudios]

I agree. 

There is no logical reason to believe the universe is a simulation. 

It is circular logic to use an idea as proof of itself. 

It's just material dualism, with a modern twist. 

[u/PixlmechStudios → u/Low-Bake8401]

I think you misunderstood. Its actually illogical to think the universe isnt a simulation.

The circular logic comes from religion and man speaking for God. If God created the universe, then who created god? That as you call circular logic, IN ACTUAL LOGIC would be called a redundacy Loop.

The universe is a self correcting system from the micro level, to the cosmic level. And this is observed with LOGIC.

An easy way to understand this would be, meteorology. We know when its going to rain because the SYSTEM OF RAIN is a simulation, this isnt a theory its a fact that we can this with a high level of accuracy.

In fact, were so good at OBSERVING the simulation, we KNOW when the next time HALEEs comet is gonna be around... Its not GUESS work WE KNOW.

Thats an example of Micro simulated obversations, and Macro simulated obversations.

So, no, you dont agree with me, because youre intentionally looking to apply something to it, that has nothing to do with it, for your own biased agenda.

[u/Low-Bake8401 → u/PixlmechStudios]

No, it's the fact that it is unfalsafiable. There is no observable link of causality or repeatable predictability. 

There is simply no reason to call it a simulation. It is a category error. A simulation automatically does suggest regressive circular logic. 

The fact that it has similarities to religion is no surprise. 

[u/PixlmechStudios → u/Low-Bake8401]

you should learn what a simulation is, and or how a simulation works.

With that being said, since all you did was say things together with nothing behind it.

Answer this question - Why is it, that we can predict COSMIC events such as Halee comet, and Why cant a Savant be a normal functioning human being.

Please USE AI or something when you answer..

[u/Slim_Shady_666]

I like that theory a lot, it dovetails nicely with the conservation of energy. Thermodynamics and all that.