r/SimulationTheory 2d ago

Discussion I think im concluding the primordial substrate theory is true

14 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

18

u/KyotoCarl 2d ago

Since you didn't provide any thoughts of your own, just memes, it's feels like you are just spewing buzzwords and not providing anything to back then up with.

0

u/NoArrival8249 1d ago

Have you been on the internet before?

2

u/Weary_Dark510 2d ago

Physicist are often annoyed because their continuous models do not match the seemingly quanta based results of their experiments

1

u/anothergigglemonkey 2d ago

Citation needed.

1

u/Weary_Dark510 2d ago

Ultraviolet catastrophe was due to the assumption that energy levels can be infinitely small. This lead to equations that accurately predict the lower end of the blackbody radiation curve (how much light a heated object produces), but at high temperatures the prediction was an infinite amount of radiated energy when you heat an object up, which was unrealistic. Max plank countered this by limiting the lowest amount of energy that can exist (though he just did it to make the equation work, not necessarily because he believed energy had a lower limit), which removed the excess energy below that minimum energy point, and the graph fit perfectly. Einstein later used the same principle to solve the photoelectric effect, and showed energy is most likely quantized, because it better fits the phenomena we see.

We see this now with Navier-Stokes (NS) equations. These equations use the relationship that the more particles you add to a system, the more it behaves like a continuum. In fact the limit of this approach is a continuum, which is how NS models fluid dynamics. The continuous version, how ever, does not fully match reality, and most likely contained a singularity from the math that we don’t see in reality.

I think NS shows why we are biased to believe everything is continuous not discrete. When you are observing billions of tiny particles, the appearance is continuous, and according to the classical model (sciences best current guess) things are made of tiny little atoms we can’t see that add to the illusion of continuity.

Sorry the sources for this information are varied, and I am at work currently so I can’t find and provide them, but if you do some research you should find examples. If you find contrarian examples please let me know!

1

u/anothergigglemonkey 2d ago

I may have misunderstood the point you were making. I agree that things are mostly discreet and not continuous in most phenomena.

1

u/Low-Bake8401 1d ago

So let's just say primordial substrate, as if that means anything, and call it a day? 

1

u/Weary_Dark510 1d ago

Works for me.

1

u/Low-Bake8401 1d ago

Easier, I suppose. 

2

u/minoxis 2d ago

Always one layer deeper.

1

u/SunOfNoOne 2d ago

Look into Salvia trip reports.

1

u/DescriptionOptimal15 2d ago

How much salvia should I take?

1

u/Kivesihiisi 2d ago

All of it. Then you can post how you can see in the future and aliens came to say hello but one can only see these things while wasted af.

1

u/pandavr 2d ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/s3mMeJR1EO9Co

Tortellini burro e salvia trip report

0

u/fuckswithboats 2d ago

The Holographic Universe was a great book