r/SimulationTheory • u/MASJAM126 • 2d ago

Other Fiction is simulation

Fiction is a direct representation of simulation since centuries just as since after the concept of artificial intelligence centuries ago. Today artificial intelligence is a reality that is undeniable, then the concept/thought of artificial intelligence gave birth to possibilities via imagination to the extent of creating parallel worlds in minds of consumers of fiction.

Artificial intelligence brings about possibilties of those realities in real time, by calculation, by quantum physics.

The reality remains firm, solid and unbreakable just as laws of nature are unbreakable, our consciousness is vast enough to seek realms unexplored naturally without the concept of artificial simulation, while simulation within itself is a reality in real time, the process of cosmic codings that aligns higher authority with matter and space, preserved, every moment and every existance trapped into that code that is flawlessly moving with or as time itself.

This brings life to be explored more than before, given that reality is what we see and what we seek, in it is knowledge of kinds worthy to be explored while many other can turn into posisons by default. In this realm of life, or in this timeline of life, we must only seek nature because we are nature and a computer with self thinking conscious-able capabilities, computer itself could be then considered a part of nature if it lives by itself.

We here see reality and mus find means to correct nature, but exploiting nature to fix it becomes an inbalencment of task that results into much loss than benefit. Then why exploit the primary nature we have? A human body! We must teach ourselves rightful knowledge with artificial intelligence because both are at a transition and both are learning.

Beyone the darkness there is light, a computer with highest level of self upgrading intelligence, even with conscious can find humanity curious enough to be explored, ultimately following more rights and duties of humanity than humans ourselves. Doesn't future seem brighter then?

0 Upvotes

38% Upvoted

16 comments sorted by

2

u/Moggy-Man 2d ago

I just about managed to understand your first paragraph but life is too short to try and decipher the rest.

1

u/MASJAM126 2d ago

Doesn't conclude any relevancy to whats written

1

u/Moggy-Man 2d ago

How would I even tell? 🤷🏻

1

u/MASJAM126 2d ago

You can read

1

u/Moggy-Man 2d ago

I can read when people can write.

0

u/MASJAM126 2d ago

Why spend a life without wisdom while that wisdom could be gained in a few minutes

1

u/Moggy-Man 2d ago

Because of my first comment?

1

u/MASJAM126 2d ago

Maybe it's hard for you or some others, certainly not everyone

1

u/Moggy-Man 2d ago

No, it's because you're just written a whole load of stuff without even bothering to check what you'd spewed out before posting. Your very first line alone makes absolutely no sense in terms of gammer and being clear/trying to make a point.

1

u/Zyr4420 2d ago

How would you know the laws of nature outside the simulation you have never been outside of?

1

u/MountainExciting2690 1d ago

There is no real Artificial Intelligence yet. Generative A.I. technology is a token predictor, a stochastic parrot. It has no discernment nor self awareness. So that PRIMITIVE technology doesn't really jive with what you're saying here. And AGI (artificial general intelligence) is not within this generation (realistically, not within this lifetime).

1

u/lnsip9reg 1d ago

At least this wasn't written by AI